Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 212 (MAD)

Ponnumuthu v. State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Sub-Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station

2016-01-20

M.VENUGOPAL

body2016
ORDER : 1. It is represented on behalf of the Revision Petitioner that the Revision Petitioner expired on 21.10.2015, which fact is not disputed on behalf of the Respondent/Complainant/State. 2. In this connection, the Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the Respondent/State/Complainant produces the true copy of the Death Certificate in respect of the Revision Petitioner, in and by which, it is quite evident that the date of death of the Revision Petitioner is mentioned as 21.10.2015. 3. Recording the factum of death of the Revision Petitioner on 21.10.2015, the present Criminal Revision Petition stands abated. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.