JUDGMENT : DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. CM No. 9086 of 2016 1. This application has been moved for disposal of the main writ petition in view of reply filed by respondent Nos. 2 to 4 with a direction to respondent No.3 to take decision regarding regularization of the services of the petitioners in view of recommendations made by Executive Officer and in view of the fact that Government of Haryana in pursuance of order dated 3.6.2016 has withdrawn decision dated 5.5.2015 to put on hold the regularization policies. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioners has brought to the notice of this Court that the decision dated 5.5.2015 has been withdrawn whereas the case of the petitioners was earlier considered in view of instructions dated 18.6.2014 as subsequent instructions dated 5.5.2015 have been withdrawn and only because of these instructions the case of the petitioners was kept pending. 3. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed regarding withdrawal of instructions dated 5.5.2015. 4. For the reasons mentioned above, the date in the main case is preponed to today and the main case is also taken up for hearing. 5. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the case of the petitioners was earlier considered and recommended but because of instructions dated 5.5.2015, their case was kept pending, meaning thereby, that now the instructions dated 5.5.2015 are not in existence as the same have been withdrawn. 6. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners in view of policy instructions dated 18.6.2014 as well as recommendations made in favour of the petitioners. The necessary exercise be done within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. 7. In case the petitioners are found to be entitled for the relief claimed, the same be granted to them within a period of three months thereafter. 8. Writ petition stands disposed of.