Vijay Sood v. Central University of Himachal Pradesh
2016-03-14
MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
body2016
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral) By the medium of these review petitions, the petitioners have sought review of the judgment and order dated 23.12.2015, whereby two writ petitions being CWPs No. 575 of 2015, titled Vijay Sood versus Central University of H.P., Dharamshala and 580 of 2015, titled Mohan Kumar & others versus Central University of HP, came to be disposed of. 2. Review Petition No. 17 of 2016 contains five paras and Review Petition No. 18 of 2016 contains six paras, which are factual grounds. 3. The grounds taken in the review petitions do not satisfy the mandate of Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 4. It is apt to record herein that this Court has already laid down the parameters in the judgments rendered in Review Petition No. 56 of 2014, titled as Ranjeet Khanna versus Chiragu Deen and another, decided on 8th August, 2014 and Review Petition No. 65 of 2015, titled as Union of India & others versus Paras Ram, decided on 25th June, 2015. 5. We have gone through the judgment under review and the grounds taken in the review petitions. The review petitioners have not taken any ground, as required under law. 6. Having said so, no case for review is made out and the review petitions merit to be dismissed. Accordingly, the review petitions are dismissed alongwith all pending applications.