JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. While hearing the case, Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, learned Senior Counsel caused appearance and stated that the respondents have not complied with the directions contained in the judgment passed by this Court in a batch of writ petitions, the lead case of which is CWP No. 3588 of 2012, which were supposed to be complied with within three months. 2. Further stated that the respondents have retired some of the writ petitioners and amended the rules, constraining one of the writ petitioners to file Contempt Petition No. 625 of 2015. The said contempt petition was disposed of vide judgment dated 22.09.2015, whereby four months' further time was granted to the respondents to comply with the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment. He also stated that the Law Department has given opinion, which finds place from pages 30 to 32 of the paper book, has also been turned down. 3. Mr. J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General, was asked to seek instructions whether the respondents have complied with the directions passed in the judgment, supra, within the time frame. He stated that the respondents are concerned only with the petitioner in this execution petition. 4. We take suo motu cognizance and draw the proceedings against the respondents. Respondents are directed to file a detailed status report indicating therein whether the respondents have complied with the directions passed by this Court within aforesaid stipulated period, in letter and spirit. 5. List on 07.12.2016.