JUDGMENT : DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioners in the present petition is that the benefit of the strike period has not been granted to them for the purposes of regularization of their services, whereas, similarly situated persons approached this Court by way of filing CWP No. 9500 of 2012, which was disposed of vide order dated 21.05.2012. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of directions issued in the said petition, the claim of the petitioners therein was considered and benefit has been granted to them. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have made a representation to the respondents and their cases were also called for consideration but no action has been taken thereupon so far. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case, the directions are issued by this Court to consider the representation and to act upon the recommendation already made. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and by considering the fact that the benefit has been granted to those persons, who have filed CWP No. 9500 of 2012, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the case of the present petitioners in view of benefit given to the petitioners in CWP No. 9500 of 2012. 5. In case, it is found that the present petitioners are at par with the petitioners, who filed CWP No. 9500 of 2012, the same benefit be granted to them within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. The petition is disposed of accordingly.