Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 250 (RAJ)

Rohit @ Mohit v. State

2016-02-15

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

body2016
ORDER : Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J. This revision petition has been filed by the Juvenile Rohit @ Mohit through his mother Smt.Veermati, under Section 53 read with Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children Act) against the order dated 18/1/2016 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bharatpur in Cr.Appeal No. 28/2016 by which the appeal filed by the juvenile has been dismissed and order dated 11/1/2016 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bharatpur dismissing the bail application filed by juvenile under Section 12 of the Act has been affirmed. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that an FIR bearing No.361/2015 came to be lodged at PS-Chiksana, Bharatpur under Sections 363, 366, 376, 342 IPC wherein the concerned police arrested the petitioner and after completion of investigation, filed challan before the Juvenile Justice Board where the case is pending. 3. On the basis of said FIR, the juvenile was arrested by the police. Thereafter the juvenile through his mother filed bail application before the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bharatpur , but the same was rejected vide order dated 11/1/2016. Against the said order, the juvenile filed a criminal appeal, but the same was also dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kota on 18/1/2016. Against the said order, this revision petition has been preferred. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 5. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the juvenile and the Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant, in my view the juvenile Rohit @ Mohit son Dharampal Singh, deserves to be released on bail provided his Mother Smt Veermati furnishes bail bonds in the amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- (rupees one lac) with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bhatatpur with the stipulation that she will produce the juvenile before the juvenile Justice Board on all dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so during the pendency of enquiry. 6. This revision petition is disposed of accordingly.