JUDGMENT & ORDER : Heard Ms. R. Purakayasta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. T.D. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has urged this Court to provide her a job under Die-in-harness Scheme as her father died in harness on 09.08.2015 while working as the Corporation Forester under Tripura Forest Development Plantation Corporation Ltd., the TFDPC in short. Lastly, he was posted at Chittamara, under Forest Corporation Division, South-I. It is also not in dispute that there is no earning member in the family of the deceased employee namely, Tapan Chandra Sen. Hence, the petitioner being the eldest daughter of the deceased employee, applied for a job under die-in-harness scheme. In terms of the Die-in-Harness Scheme, as in force in the Government Departments, the petitioner has got the eligibility for appointment under that scheme. As the Corporation was not acting on her application for providing job under the die-in-harness scheme and particularly on the face of the communication dated 02.03.2016, Annexure-G to the writ petition, whereby it has been apprised to the mother of the petitioner, namely Madhuri Nag Sen, she has approached this Court. The said communication dated 02.03.2016 reads as under: “I am directed to refer to the above and to inform you that as per prevalent Govt. Rule, Corporation is unable to provide employment. As per Government order in lieu of employment under ‘Die-in-Harness Scheme’ you are eligible to get Rs.1,00,000/- as financial Assistance. There is also Govt. order regarding mode of payment. Out of total financial assistance, Rs.96,000/- will be deposited in the Monthly Savings Scheme and rest amount of Rs.4,000/- in Kishan Bikash Patra of Postal Department. Duration of MIS will be for a period of six years at the end of which the entire amount is to be paid by the Post Office to the concerned party. The benefit is applicable only if there is no earning member in your family. I am thus directed to inform you that you may apply for the benefit if there is no earning member in your family. Your application should be supported by document issued by SDM indicating that there is no earning member in the family.” In expectation of getting a job, the family members of the deceased employee did not accept the sum of Rs. Your application should be supported by document issued by SDM indicating that there is no earning member in the family.” In expectation of getting a job, the family members of the deceased employee did not accept the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac) as the financial assistance under the die-in-harness scheme, in vogue in the corporation. 3. The respondents by filing a counter affidavit have stated that the employees of the Public Sector Undertakings, the PSUs in short, did not come under the preview of die-in-harness scheme, meant for the State Government employees and due to non-availability of vacancies, the concerned organizations are not in a position to provide any employment under the die-in-harness scheme. Since the decision of the Government under die-in-harness scheme has not been extended to the PSUs, therefore, it is not possible to create a supernumerary posts, where the PSUs are expected to accommodate the cases falling under the purview of the die-in-harness scheme. In this regard, they have relied on a circular issued by the General Administration (P&T) Department, Government of Tripura on 30.05.2001, Annexure-R/2 to the counter affidavit. 4. Mr. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that the die-in-harness scheme has not been extended to the PSUs and they are guided by the circular of G.A (P&T) Department as all the PSUs for any measure involving the finance has to be concurred by the State Government. In view of that general instruction in the form of the order dated 30.05.2001, Annexure-R/2 to the counter affidavit, the following benefit can be availed by the dependants of the family members of the deceased employee who died in harness: “....it has been decided that one time financial assistance of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac) only shall be paid by the concerned organisation from their own resources to the dependent of the deceased employee, provided there is no earning member in the family.” 5. Mr. Majumder, learned counsel has also pointed out that they had already communicated to the wife of the deceased employee the consent so that out of the said sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-, Rs. 96,000/- can be invested in the monthly savings scheme and the remaining amount in the Kishan Bikash Patra of the Postal Department. He has also pointed out that duration of such investment will be 6(six) years. But the petitioner’s mother has not communicated their so far. 1,00,000/-, Rs. 96,000/- can be invested in the monthly savings scheme and the remaining amount in the Kishan Bikash Patra of the Postal Department. He has also pointed out that duration of such investment will be 6(six) years. But the petitioner’s mother has not communicated their so far. As a result, the said sum is still lying with the respondents, the TFDPC. However, the petitioner by filing the rejoinder has stated that the die-in-harness scheme has been entirely overhauled by the notification dated 28.12.2015. 6. From perusal of the said notification, it would be apparent, contended by Ms. Purakayasta, learned counsel for the petitioner, that it has caused super-session of all earlier instructions and as such, by the said notification even the PSUs are now covered. 7. Ms. Purakayasta, learned counsel on the final call has however conceded that the said notification does not cover the PSUs employees. This notification is only related to the employees who were working under Government of Tripura in various departments. Ms. Purakayasta, learned counsel has however urged this Court that having due regard to the difficult times the deceased employee’s family has been passing through, the corporation may, even if there is no die-in-harness scheme in vogue, may be directed to consider the appointment of the petitioner on special consideration. 8. Having considered this contention and the records placed before this Court, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner’s appointment cannot be considered under the die-in-harness scheme, as in force for the employees of the Government of Tripura. Further, the family of the deceased employee is entitled to get Rs. 1,00,000/- as the financial assistance and the same has been extended to them. They may ask for getting the investment in the mode as prescribed by the Corporation and on communication of the consent, the Corporation within 15 days shall invest in the mode as proposed by the communication dated 02.03.2016. In addition thereto, the respondents are directed to make an effort on compassionate ground to explore whether the petitioner or any other eligible member of the family of the deceased employee can be accommodated with a job so that they can tide over their difficult times for sudden death of the said employee. It is made clear that it is not a direction but it is for humane consideration as the benevolent employer. It is made clear that it is not a direction but it is for humane consideration as the benevolent employer. With this observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.