ORDER : Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. It appears that the respondent/contemnor had passed the order on 10.06.2016 in Na.Ka.No.1551/A3/2015, inter alia stating that the petitioner's petition dated 17.03.2016 was examined and apart from that, the petitioner was informed at the time of deployment, his request would be considered. 3. In the instant case on hand, it cannot be said that the respondent/contemnor had not considered the petition dated 17.03.2016. In fact, after examining the petitioner's petition dated 17.03.2016, the order came to be passed as stated supra. If at all the petitioner has a grievance against the order dated 10.06.2016 passed by the respondent/contemnor, then, it is open to him to assail the correctness of the said order before the competent forum in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law. 4. As such, the contempt petition is closed.