KARAMJEET SINGH SODI @ KABIR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2016-07-01
SUDHANSHU DHULIA
body2016
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. A.S. Gill, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Milind Raj, Brief Holder for the State and perused the records. 2. The applicant is in jail being implicated in Case Crime No. 17 of 2016 which has been registered under Sections 363/366-A/376 of I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act at Police Station–Raiwala, District Dehradun. 3. The allegation against the present applicant is that he had kidnapped the daughter of the complainant. The victim/girl was recovered after 5 months. The victim/girl is aged about 16 years and the present applicant is aged about 20 years. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the girl/victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has denied the story of the prosecution. The applicant is in jail since 23.05.2016. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the applicant has been able to make out a case of bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the equal amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 6. It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of disposal of bail application. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any other proceedings.