JUDGMENT : Vineet Kothari, J. The appellants/defendants/tenants have preferred this second appeal under Section 100 of CPC, 1908, impugning the judgment and decree dated 14.12.2015 passed by learned first appellate court of learned Addl. District Judge No.4, Jaipur District, Jaipur, in Civil First Appeal No.1/2014 (15/2009) (Hariram Saini (D) through LR's & Anr. v. Vimla Sharma & Ors.) whereby the learned first appellate court dismissed the first appeal filed by the defendants and affirmed the judgment and eviction decree dated 24.09.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kotputli, District: Jaipur, in Civil Original Suit No.4/2001- Badri Prasad (D) through LR's v. Hariram Saini & Anr., whereby the learned trial court decreed the suit filed by the original plaintiff/landlord, Sh. Badri Prasad, for eviction of the defendants from the suit shop, situated at Kotputli Mohalla, Basdi, Bansoor Road, Jaipur, on the ground of reasonable and bona fide necessity of landlord and default in payment of rent and subletting. Both the courts below have concurrently granted eviction decree on the ground of default in payment of rent, bona fide and reasonable necessity of the landlord. 2. Both the courts below have concurrently granted eviction decree on the ground of default in payment of rent, bona fide and reasonable necessity of the landlord. 2. The suit for eviction filed by the plaintiffs/respondents was decreed by the learned trial court vide judgment and decree dated 24.09.2009 with the following findings: - ^^rudh uEcj 2% rudh uEcj 2 dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj oknh ij gS oknh us vius iksrs ds O;olk; ds fy;s fooknxzLr nqdku dh futh ,oa ln~Hkkoh vko';drk gSA oknh us vius iksrs xksikyd`".k ds fy;s ln~Hkkoh ,oa futh vko';drk crk;h bl laca/k esa iksrs xksiky d`".k ds c;ku djok;s gSa vkSj vius Lo;a ds c;ku djok;s gSaA oknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us dgk fd iksrk mldk dEI;wVj dkslZ dj lkWQ~Vos;j ,oa osclkbZV MoyiesUV dk dke dk O;fDr gS lkbcj dSQs dk dke djuk pkgrk gS vkSj tc ls dkslZ fd;k gS rc ls og [kkyh cSBk gS tcfd izfroknh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us dgk gS fd oknh dk iksrk xksikyd`".k vius ukuk dh izksiVhZ ikyu esa O;olk; djrk gS bl laca/k esa mlds bude VSDl ds Hkh dkxtkr gS oknh us tks izek.k i= is'k fd;s gSa nkok is'k djus dh fnukad dks mls fMdzh gh ugha feyh Fkh bl ij oknh ds vf/koDrk us dgk gS fd oknh ijh{kk ns pqdk Fkk vkSj ikl Hkh gks x;k gSA nks&pkj fnu vkxs&ihNs fMxzh feyrh gSA oknh xksiky] cnzhizlkn] rhljk xokg pkSFkey o eqds'k us bu lHkh us oknh ds dEI;wVj O;olk; djus dk bPNqd crk;k gS vkSj og dEI;wVj esa dksViwryh esa lkbcj dSQs dk O;olk; djuk pkgrk gS dEI;wVj dh Vs~fuax dj j[kk gSA xokg eqds'k us Hkh dgk gS fd rhu pkj lky ls og [kkyh Mksy jgk gSA xksiky d`".k ih0M0&1 ds :i esa ijhf{kr gqvk gS vkSj blus p.Mhx<+ ls fMIyksek bu ,MokUl dEI;wfVax dk dkslZ djuk crk;k gSA lkWQVos;j ,oa osclkbZV MoyiesaV dk dk;Z tkurk gS vkSj mDr fMxzh lkbZcj dSQs dh O;olk; djus ds mn~ns'; ls fd;k Fkk mDr dkslZ djus ds ckn [kkyh gh cSBk gSA ch0dkWe0 dh ekdZ'khV izn'kZ&2] QksVksa izfr izn'kZ&2, gS] dEI;wVj dkslZ ds izek.k i= izn'kZ&3 ls 5 QksVksa izfr izn'kZ&3, ls 5, rd gS] ftjg esa bl xokg us dgk gS fd fookfnr nqdku ds mRrj esa esjh dksbZ dEI;wVj dh nqdku ugha gSA fookfnr nqdku lka[kyk lsUVj gS izn'kZ Mh&1 ,oa Mh&2 fn[kkus ij bl xokg us dgk gS fd ,Dl LFkku ls ekdZ nqdku fookfnr gS okbZ LFkku ls nf'kZr nqdku dh txg dksbZ nqdku ugha gSA esjh u rks dEI;wVj dh nqdku gS u gh dksbZ vkbfM;k gS vkbfM;k cksMZ ,T;wds'ku dk gS blesa dksfpax Dyklsl gksrh gS vkSj jfoUnz flag ;kno }kjk pyk;h tkrh gSA os 9oha] 10oha dks i<+krs gSa lHkh lCtsDV i<+krs gSaA esjs firkth nks HkkbZ gS] l:.M esa mudh dksbZ QSDV~h ugha gS Mkcyk jksM+ ij b.Vhfj;j esa nqdku gS ml ij nqxkZ batu oDlZ dh nqdku gS tgka ,d VS~DVj dk odZ'kkWi gS ;g fookfnr nqdku dh txg ls dkQh cM+h gSA izfroknh ds ikl fookfnr nqdku ds ikl gh vU; nks nqdkusa gS] nks nqdku diM+s dh gSA esjs ukukth ds dksbZ iq= larku ugha gS esjh ekrkth gh gSA bl izdkj ls Lo;a xksiky d`".k dEI;wVj dkslZ djus ds i'pkr~ [kkyh gS vius c;ku esa crk;k gS ftjg esa ,slk dksbZ iz'u ugha iwNk tk ldk fd ftlls ;g lkeus vk;s fd ;g oknh dk iksrk dksbZ jkstxkj dksViwryh esa dj jgk gksA oknh cnzhizlkn us Hkh ih0M0&2 ds :i esa bu rF;ksa dks vius c;kuksa ds eq[; ijh{kk esa crk;k gS bl xokg us ;gh dgk gS fd iksrk ds fy;s nqdku dh t:jr gS D;ksafd xksiky d`".k [kkyh cSBk gSA xksiky d`".k vius ukuk dh nqdku ikye] fnYyh esa O;olk; djrk gks bl ckr ls badkj fd;k gS vkSj xksiky d`".k ds ukuk dh ixM+h d`".kdkar ds ca/kh gS ;g crk;k gS fd xksiky dk cM+k HkkbZ d`".k ikye esa nqdku djrk gSA bl nqdku esa vkxs pydj esjs ikl ,d edku gS tks lM+d ij [kqyrk gS ogha ij lR;ukjk;.k dh nqdku izfroknh us ys yh gS bl edku esa cSBduqek dejk gS tks esjs cSBus dh txg gS vkSj oknh odkyr djrk Fkk] esjs yM+ds cgw o i<+us okys cPps ogka jgrs gSa eSa ogk vkrk tkrk jgrk gwWaA ;g xyr gS fd jkes'oj ds ikl bl nqdku ds vykok /ka/kk u gksA p.Mhx<+ esa xksikyd`".k us dEI;wVj Vs~fuax yh gS esjk iksrk [kkyh fQj jgk gS mls nqdku pkfg;sA blh izdkj ls xokg ih0M0&3 pkSFkey Hkh eq[; ijh{kk esa xksikyd`".k }kjk p.Mhx<+ ls dEI;wVj dk dke lh[kuk crk;k gS tcfd og [kkyh gS xksiky d`".k dksViwryh esa dksbZ dke dj jgk gks ,slk pkSFkey dh ftjg ls lkeus ugha vk;kA eqds'k xks;y ih0M0&4 us Hkh blh izdkj ds dFku fd;k gSA bl izdkj ls oknh ds xokgksa us oknh ds iksrs ds O;olk; ds fy;s nqdku dh vko';drk crk;hA mldk iksrk dEI;wVj Vs~fuax djds [kkyh cSBs gq;s gS vius c;kuksa ls lkfcr fd;k gSA izfroknh us bl laca/k esa xokg Mh0M0&1&jkes'oj Lo;a dk c;ku djok;k gS jkes'oj us gfjjke dh lk>snkjh esa O;olk; djuk crk;k gS fdUrq ;g Hkh dgk gS fd QeZ lka[kyk lkM+h ls.Vj dk ekfyd ,d gh gS HkkbZ lkgc i<+s fy[ks ugha gSa blfy;s lkjk dke eSa gh ns[krk gwWa] fdUrq fjVuZ vius uke ls Hkjrk gwWa crk;k gS fookfnr nqdku ls 150 xt dh nwjh ij dVihl dh nqdku fpjathyky iq= ?kklh yky dh nqdku gS vkSj mldk Hkrhtk yxrk gS fdUrq ;g dgk gS fd 'kq: ls vyx jgrk gSA uohu xkjesUV dh nqdku fookfnr nqdku ls 15&20 xt dh nwjh ij gh gS ftldk ekfyd dSyk'k gS gfjjke us tfj;s izn'kZ ih&6 lqUnjiqj esa nqdku [kjhnh ftls ckn esa dSyk'k dks nqdku ns nh mlesa uohu xkjesUV dk dke py jgk gSA izn'kZ ih&7 fodz;&i= ds }kjk eSaus dSyk'k nqyhpUn ls tehu [kjhnh tks fjgk;'kh gS nqdku ugha gSA xksikyd`".k dEI;wVj lkbZal ls dj j[kk gks rks eq>s irk ugha og dksViwryh esa dke ugha dj jgk gS og fnYyh esa jgrk gSA bl izdkj ls ;g eq[; xokg gS xksikyd`".k us D;k dj j[kk gS] D;k i<+kbZ dh gS] bldks irk ugha fdUrq bruk nch tcku esa bl xokg us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd xksiky d`".k dksViwryh esa dksbZ dke ugha dj jgk gSA rhlj xokg jkedqokj gS ftlus eq[; ijh{kk esa ;g crk;k gS fd oknh ds ikl 'kekZ d`f"k QkeZ ds uke ls 10 ch?kk tehu gS vkSj oknh cnzhizlkn o xksfoUn izlkn l:.M esa jgrs gSa Mkcyk jksM+ ij bldh 40 nqdku dh tehu gS ftlesa 3 nqdku ,d gky cuk gS O;olkf;d txg gS cnzhizlkn dh gosyh ds mRrj esa ,d iwjc >kadrh gq;h nqdku [kkyh iM+h gS og xokg gfjjke ds lkFk gh nloha Dykl i<+k gSA xksikyd`".k ch0,0 dj j[kk gSA dEI;wVj dkslZ Hkh dj j[kk gS dksViwryh esa ;g dke ugha djrk gS ikye esa dke djrk gSA bl xokg us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd xksiyd`".k ch0,0 ikl gS dEI;wVj dk dke tkurk gSA xokg Hkh[kkjke Mh0M0&3 us Hkh oknh ds ikl QkeZ gkml] Mkcykj jksM+ ij tehu] nqdku gksuk crk;k gS ftjg esa dgk gS fd xksiky ds fnYyh esa Vhoh o dEI;wVj cukrs gSa fdl uke ls cukrs gSa irk ughaA Vhoh cukus dh ikyuk esa QSDV~h gS deZpkjh gS fdUrq eSaus mlls Vhoh ugha yhA dEI;wVj fdl uke ls cukrs gSa irk ughaA eq>s irk ugha fd jktLFkku fo'ofo|ky; ls xksikyd`".k us ch0dkWe0 ikl fd;k gks vkSj dEI;wVj ,twds'ku dh Vs~fuax fd;k gksA bl izdkj ls bl xokg us ftl izdkj ls ftjg esa crk;k mlls ;g Hkh fu"d"kZ fudyrk gS fd xksiky d`".k ds ckjs esa bl xokg dks irk ugha gS ;k tkucw>dj xyr cksy jgk gSA xokg Mh0M0&4&dSyk'k pUnz lSuh gS blus viuh eq[; ijh{kk esa ;g dgk gS fd xksiky d`".k dks fooknxzLr nqdku dh vko';drk ugha gS cfYd buds ikl bl nqdku ds ikl ,d vU; [kkyh txg gS vkSj ftjg esa blh rjg ds dFku fd;s gSa fdUrq bl xokg us ;g dgk gS fd xksiky fnYyh esa 10&12 lky ls lkWQV~os;j dk dke dj jgk gS tks 'kekZ dEI;wVj ds uke ls gS eSaus dksbZ dke ugha djok;k ij fo'okl gh fd;k Fkk mls dksbZ iSls dk ysu nsu ugha FkkA bl izdkj ls xksiky dkSu lk dke dj jgk gS ;g xokg Li"V ugha fd;kA xokg Mh0M0&5&jes'k ftUny gS tks jsfMesM diM+s lsfyax ds v/;{k gSa us xksikyd`".k ds ckjs esa D;k dk;Z djrk gS dksbZ tkudkjh ugha nh gSA bl izdkj ls oknh ds xokgksa us vius c;kuksa esa Li"V fd;k gS fd xksiky d`".k oknh cnzh dk iksrk gS vkSj og dEI;wVj ds fy;s dksbZ txg ugha gS gkykafd izfroknh dh vksj ls ;g lq>k;k x;k gS fd bl fookfnr tehu ds vkxs ,d [kkyh txg gS tks nqdku ds :i esa gh gS mlesa dke dj ldrk gS fdUrq bl ckr ls oknh us badkj fd;k gS fd dksbz [kkyh txg nqdku ugha gS edku dh txg gSA ;g Hkh izfroknh ds xokgksa us nch tcku ds :i esa Lohdkj fd;k gS fd oknh dk iksrk ch0,0 ikl gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr xokgksa ds c;kuksa ls oknh dks vius iksrs ds O;olk; ds fy;s fooknxzLr nqdku dh l[r vko';drk gS lkeus vkrk gS vkSj lkfcr Hkh gksrk gS] tgka rd oknh dks ln~Hkkoh vko';drk gS oknh dk iksrk xksiky d`".k Hkh vius c;kuksa esa ;g crk;k fd ;ksX;rk ds vk/kkj ij mls O;olk; djus ds fy;s nqdku dh vko';drk gSA xksiky d`".k ds oknh ds CyM fjys'ku gS vkSj 1996 Mh0,u0ts0 jktLFkku ist 16 esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us ;g fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd laifRr dk Lokeh cksukQkbM vko';drk ds fy;s csLV tt gSA 1996 Mh0,u0ts0 jktLFkku ist 161 esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd ifjlj Lokeh gh viuh vko';drk dk fu.kZ; djus dk vkSfpR; j[krk gSa 2004 vkj0,y0vkj0] ist 515 tgka rd lwVsfcyVh dk iz'u gS os bldk fu.kZ; HkwLokeh dh lqfo/kk ds vuqlkj fu.khZr fd;k tk;sxk] mlds ifjokj ds ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds vuqlkj r; fd;k tkrk gS vkSj fdjk;snkj ;g fMDVsV ugha dj ldrk fd ys.MyksMZ ugha dj ldrk gS fd ys.MyksMZ fdl rjg ls viuk dke pyk;sA bl izdkj ls ys.MyksMZ vius vkSfpR; dks lkfcr djus ds fy;s lcls vPNk fu.kkZ;d crk;k gSA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us vius fu.kZ; esa fu/kkZfjr fd;k gSA gkykafd foi{kh dh vksj ls vkj0,y0vkj0 1978 ikVZ ist 589 is'k fd;k gS ftlesa ekuuh; iatkc ,.M gfj;k.kk mPp U;k;ky; us fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd iksrk HkwLokeh dk lnL; eqf'dy :i ls ekuk tkrk gS] ysfdu izLrqr izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ;g Li"V gS fd oknh mldk iksrk gs vkSj iksrs ds ns[kHkky dh ftEesnkjh nknk dh curh gS vkSj mldk iksrk [kkyh dEI;wVj dkslZ djus ds i'pkr~ cSBk gSA esjs fopkj ls oknh o mlds xokgksa ls ;g lkfcr gksrk gS fd oknh ds iksrk ds fy;s ln~Hkkoh vko';drk gSA vr% rudh uEcj 2 oknh ds i{k esa lkfcr gksrh gSA vkns'k 1- izfroknh nks ekg ds vUnj fookfnr nqdku dk dCtk oknh dks laHkyok;sA 2- izfroknh oknh nqdku dk fdjk;k :0 8]526@& nks ekg ds vUnj oknh dks vnk djsA 3- izfroknh nqdku [kkyh gksus rd dk :0 1]400@& izfrekg dk fdjk;k Hkh oknh dks vnk djsA 4- oknh okn O;; Hkh izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ?kksf"kr fd;k tkrk gSA 5- rnkuqlkj fMdzh ipkZ rS;kj gksA ,l-Mh-@& vfr0 eq[; U;kf;d eftLV~sV dksViwryh ¼t;iqj½ jkt0** 3. The first appeal filed by the defendants/appellants was, dismissed by the learned first appellate court vide judgment and decree dated 14.12.2015 with the following findings: - fook|d la[;k 2& fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us bl fook|d dks jsLiksMsUV@oknh ds i{k esa ,oa vihykUV@izfroknhx.k ds fo:) fu.khZr fd;k gSA oknhx.k us vius okn&i= esa iksrk xksikyd`".k iq= gfjizlkn dks dEI;wVj lkbcj&dSQs ds O;olk; gsrq fookfnr nqdku dh ln~Hkkfod vko';drk crk;h gS rFkk ;g Hkh dFku fd;k gS fd nqdku miyC/k ugha gksus dh fLFkfr esa og csdkj ?kwe jgk gSA ;g Hkh dFku fd;k gS fd izfroknh Lo;a us fookfnr nqdku ds ikl gh Hkwfe [kjhn dj fuekZ.k dj yh gS tks mlds dCts esa gSA bldk izfroknh dh vksj ls [k.Mu fd;k x;k gS rFkk xksikyd`".k ds fy, nqdku dh dksbZ ln~Hkkoh vko';drk ugha crk;h gSA vihykUV@izfroknhx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us ;g rdZ fn;k fd iksrk ifjokj dk lnL; ugha gSA tcfd jsLiksMsaV@oknh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us iksrk dks ifjokj dk lnL; ds :i esa gksus lEcU/kh ekuuh; fu.kZ; izLrqr fd;k tks iwoZ esa lanfHkZr fd;k tk pqdk gSA oknh i{k dh vksj ls dFku fd;k x;k gS fd xksikyd`".k }kjk dEI;wVj dh Vs~fuax dj j[kh gS rFkk og dksViwryh esa lkbcj&dSQs dk O;olk; djuk pkgrk gSA xksikyd`".k ih0MCY;w0&1 us dFku fd;k gS fd mlus p.Mhx<+ ls fMIyksek bu ,MokUl dEI;qfVax dk dkslZ fd;k gqvk gS rFkk lkWQV~os;j ,oa osclkbV MoyiesaV dk dk;Z tkurk gS] mlesa lkbcj dSQs dk O;olk; djus ds mn~ns'; ls mDr dkslZ dh fMxzh izkIr dh FkhA mDr dkslZ djus ds ckn [kkyh cSBk gSA bl xokg us vius 'kS{kf.kd ,oa dEI;wVj dkslZ fMxzh vkfn nLrkostkr dks iznf'kZr djk;k gSA ih0MCY;w0&2&cnzhizlkn us l'kiFk dFkuksa esa dgk gS fd iksrk xksikyd`".k [kkyh cSBk gSA bl xokg us bl ckr ls badkj fd;k gS fd xksikyd`".k vius ukuk gh nqdku ikye] fnYyh esa O;olk; djrk gksA xokg ih0MCY;w0&3 pkSFkey o ih0MCY;w0&4&eqds'k ds dFkuksa ls ;gh rF; izdV gksrk gS fd oknh dk ikSrk xksikyd`".k p.Mhx<+ ls dEI;wVj dk dkslZ djus ds ckn ls [kkyh cSBk gS rFkk oknh dks vius iksrs ds O;olk; ds fy, nqdku dh vko';drk gSA Mh0MCY;w0&1&jkes'oj us vius l'kiFk c;kuksa esa gfjjke dh lk>snkjh esa O;olk; djuk crk;k gS rFkk QeZ lka[kyk lkM+h lsUVj dk ekfyd ,d gh gksuk dgk gS rFkk HkkbZ lkgc ds i<+s fy[ks ugha gksus ls lkjk dke Lo;a ds }kjk gh ns[kuk dgk gSA fookfnr nqdku ls 50 xt dh nwjh ij dVihl dh nqdku fpjathyky iq= ?kklhyky dh nqdku gS tks mldk Hkrhtk yxrk gS fdUrq 'kq: ls vyx jgrk gSA vkxs dFku fd;k gS fd uohu xkjesaV dh nqdku fookfnr nqdku ls 15&20 xt dh nwjh ij gS ftldk ekfyd dSyk'k gS] gfjjke us tfj;s izn'kZ Mh&6 lqUnjiqj esa nqdku [kjhnh ftls ckn esa dSyk'k dks ns nh mlesa uohu xkjesaV dk dke py jgk gSA izn'kZ Mh&7 fodz; i= ds }kjk mlus dSyk'k] nyhpUn ls tehu [kjhnh tks fjgk;'kh gS] nqdku ugha gSA xksikyd`".k us dEI;wVj lkbal dk dkslZ dj fMIyksek dh fMxzh ys j[kh gks rks mls irk ugha gksuk dgk gS rFkk og dksViwryh esa dke ugha djrk gS] og fnYyh esa jgrk gSA bl izdkj bl xokg us Lohdkj fd;k gS fd xksikyd`".k dk dksViwryh esa dke ugha dj jgk gSA xokg Mh0MCY;w0&2&jkedqaokj us dFku fd;k gS fd oknh ds ikl 'kekZ d`f"k QkWeZ ds uke ls 10 ch?kk tehu gS vkSj Mkcyk jksM+ ij bldh 40 nqdku dh tehu gS ftlesa 3 nqdku ,d gky cuk gS] O;olkf;d txg gS] cnzhizlkn dh gosyh esa ,d iwoZ >kadrh gqbZ nqdku [kkyh iM+h gSA xksikyd`".k us ch0,0 dj j[kk gS] dEI;wVj dk dkslZ Hkh dj j[kk gS] dksViwryh esa ;g dke ugha djrk gS] ikye esa dke djrk gSA xokg Mh0MCY;w0&3&Hkh[kkjke us ftjg esa dFku fd;k gS fd xksiky fnYyh esa Vhoh o dEI;wVj cukrs gSa] fdl uke ls cukrs gSa] irk ughaA xokg Mh0MCY;w0&4&dSyk'k pUnz us dFku fd;k gS fd xksikyd`".k dks fookfnr nqdku dh vko';drk ugha gS cfYd buds ikl bl nqdku ds ikl ,d vU; [kkyh txg gS rFkk ftjg esa xksiky dk fnYyh esa 10&12 lky ls lkWQ~Vos;j dk dke 'kekZ dEI;wVj ds uke ls djuk crk;k gS] eSaus dksbZ dke ugha djok;k ij fo'okl gh fd;k Fkk mlls dksbZ iSls dk ysus nsu ugha fd;kA Mh0MCY;w0&5&jes'k us xksikyd`".k D;k dk;Z djrk gS] ds ckjs esa dksbZ tkudkjh ugha nh gSA bl izdkj i=koyh ij vk;h lk{kh ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd xksikyd`".k oknh cnzhizlkn dk iksrk gS vkSj mlus dEI;wVj dh Vs~fuax dj j[kh gS rFkk og [kkyh gS ,oa dksViwryh esa mlds ikl O;olk; ds fy, dksbZ txg ugha gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr xokgksa ds c;kuksa ls oknh dks vius iksrs ds O;olk; ds fy, oknxzLr nqdku dh vko';drk gksuk lkfcr gksrk gSA bl laca/k esa jsLiksMsaV@oknh dh vksj ls mRrjkf/kdkjh Jherh fcey daoj cuke iq"ipUn] 2009¼1½ Mh0,u0ts0 jkt0 505] dk ekuuh; fu.kZ; izLrqr fd;k gSA bl ekuuh; fu.kZ; esa iksrk dh vko';drk ds fy, fu"dklu dk okn izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ,oa ,d vU; ekuuh; fu.kZ; ';ke egkRek cuke~ Jh ckcw [kku] 2009¼1½ Mh0,u0ts0 jkt0 453] esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd edku ekfyd viuh vko';drk dk lcls vPNk tt gksrk gSA fdjk;snkj mldks bl laca/k esa 'krZ ugha crk ldrk vFkkZr fdjk;snkj ;g ugha dg ldrk gS fd og miyC/k ifjlj esa dSls lek;ksftr djsA jsLiksMsUV@oknhx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh vksj ls izLrqr ekuuh; fu.kZ; gLrxr izdj.k ij pLik gksrs gSA vihykUV@izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ekuuh; fu.kZ; ds rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ka fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k izdj.k pLik ugha gksrs gSaA mYys[kuh; gS fd gLrxr izdj.k esa vihykUV dk ;g dFku gS fd jsLiksMsaV ds ikl vkSj ifjlj gS vkSj mlesa og jg ldrk gSA tcfd jsLiksMsaV dk dFku gS fd xksiky ds O;olk; djus ds fy, mlds ikl mi;qZDr ifjlj miyC/k ugha gSA ;gka ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd vihykUV@izfroknh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g dFku jgk gS fd brus fnu rd xksikyd`".k dgha vU;= dke dj jgk gSA ;gka ;g m)r djuk lehphu gS fd dksbZ Hkh O;fDr nqdku ds [kkyh gksus dk bartkj djrs gq, yEcs le; rd ,d txg [kkyh cSBk ugha jg ldrk gSA blfy, vihykUV@izfroknh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g rdZ la/kkj.k ;ksX; ugha gSA gLrxr izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ;g Li"V gS fd xksikyd`".k oknh dk iksrk gSA vkSj iksrs dh ns[kHkky djuk nknk dh ftEesnkjh gSA okn dk iksrk dEI;wVj dk dkslZ djus ds i'pkr~ [kkyh cSBk gS rFkk mlds O;olk; ds fy, oknh dks oknxzLr nqdku dh vko';drk gSA bl izdkj i=koyh ij miyC/k ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkostkr lk{; ds vk/kkj ij oknh dks iksrs ds O;olk; ds oknxzLr nqdku dh ln~Hkkoh vko';drk gksus dk rF; izekf.kr djus esa oknh lQy jgk gSA jsLiksMsUV@oknh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk izLrqr ekuuh; fu.kZ; esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fl)kUr dh jks'kuh esa fo}klu v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk tks fu.kz; ikfjr fd;k x;k gS og lgh gS rFkk lk{; ,oa fof/k dh lgh foospuk djrs gq, ;g fcUnq oknh ds i{k esa fu.khZr fd;k gSA bl izdkj mDr fook|d la[;k 2 fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk jsLiksMsUV@oknh ds i{k esa ,oa vihykUV@izfroknh ds fo:) r; djus dks tks fu"d"kZ ,oa fofu'p; ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ;g iq"V fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA vkns'k ifj.kkeLo:i vihykFkhZ@izfroknhx.k gfjjke o vU; }kjk izLrqr ;g fu;fer nhokuh vihy fo:) izR;FkhZx.k@ oknhx.k foeyk 'kekZ o vU; lkjghu gksus ls [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ofj"B [k.M dksViwryh] ftyk&tiqj }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k 4@2001&cmuokuh cnzhizlkn e`rd oknh o vU; cuke gjhjke o vU;] esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh fnukad 24-09-2009 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA vihy dk [kpkZ i{kdkjku viuk viuk Lo;a ogu djsaxsA fu;ekuqlkj fMdzh ipkZ cuk;k tkosA fu.kZ; dh izfr e; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vfHkys[k ds lkFk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc fHktokbZ tkosA ,l-Mh-@& ¼fxfjts'k dqekj vks>k½ vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k dze&4 t;iqj ftyk] t;iqj** 4. Mr. N.K. Maloo, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Vinod kumar Tamoliya, learned counsel for the appellants/defendants urged that neither there was any specific pleading nor evidence adduced by the plainitff/respondent about the dependency of his grandson, namely, Gopalkrishan, on the grandfather, Sh. Badriprasad nor the grandson was living with his grandfather, therefore, the alleged bona fide need cannot be said to be a real and reasonable necessity. He further submitted that an application under Order 41, Rule 27 CPC was also filed by the appellants/defendants before the first appellate court bringing to the notice of the first appellate court that the landlord has subsequently purchased another premises, in which a shop for carrying the business of readymade garment has been opened and the said grandson, namely, Gopalkrishan, for whose necessity the suit shop was sought to be evicted, his business need could be satisfied by other vacant available shops with the landlord. He, therefore, argued that other shops were also available in the newly constructed building and thus the in spite of availability other alternative shops to the plainitff/landlord, the eviction sought by the landlord was and is not bona fide. 5. Learned counsel for the appellants/defendants also relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Smt. Rajinder Dhadha v. Jagdish Singh reported in 2002 (10) SCC 665 and urged that in absence of any averment or evidence that such son was the member of family, and was living ordinarily with his father, the eviction cannot be granted on such grounds. 6. On the other hand, Mr. Anand Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents/plaintiffs urged that not only it was averred in the suit itself that the suit shop was required for the purpose of starting business of cyber caffe for the grandson of the original plaintiff/landlord but also in the affidavit-in-chief and the cross-examination, it was specifically stated and proved that the suit shop was required bonafidely and, therefore, the eviction decree concurrently granted by the courts below, deserve to be upheld. He also submitted that though subsequently certain shops were constructed by the landlord, grandfather, the same were not available for said grandson and that cannot be made basis or ground to deny the eviction decree, as the necessity of the suit shop is to be determined on the date of filing of the suit, and therefore, merely because certain other shops were constructed by the landlord, eviction decree cannot be reversed. He further submitted that the landlord is the best judge to decide his business needs and the tenant cannot dictate terms in this regard. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Denzil Nagrath v. LRs. of Balwant Singh reported in 2011(3) DNJ (Raj.) 1217 in which it has been held as under: - "Having heard learned counsels for the parties and having gone through the impugned judgment and evidence recorded by the learned trial court, this Court is satisfied that the findings of the fact about the bona fide need of the landlord recorded by the learned trial court are not perverse in any manner. They are based on cogent reasons and evidence and no interference in the impugned judgment is required to be made in the present first appeal of the defendant-tenant. The owner-plaintiff, Swarn Singh has clearly stated in paras 7 and 8 of his affidavit that the available house with the plaintiff's family was very small of three rooms and for a family of two married brothers and three married sisters and parents of them, the said accommodation was very short of the requirement and, therefore, they needed the suit house for their own residential purposes. Nothing in the cross-examination was even asked from the said deponent about the relationship and number of family members and, therefore, the averments made in the affidavit was sufficient proof unshaken in the cross-examination of the said deponent, namely, Swarn Singh. Nothing in the cross-examination was even asked from the said deponent about the relationship and number of family members and, therefore, the averments made in the affidavit was sufficient proof unshaken in the cross-examination of the said deponent, namely, Swarn Singh. It is well settled that findings about the bona fide need of the landlord are findings of fact and unless they can be said to be perverse or without any foundation, the same cannot be interfered with by the appellate court; and even though this is first appeal as the trial Court was that of learned Additional District Judge, Sri Karanpur and requirement of substantial question of law may not be there as such as is required for second appeal under Section 100 C.P.C., still this Court is satisfied that decree under appeal deserves no interference and the present appeal filed by the defendant-tenant has no merit." 7. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs/landlord also relied upon a judgment of this Court in the case of LR's of Prakash v. Poornima (SBCSA No.132/2009, decided on 11.05.2011), in which this Court while emphasising that landlord is the best judge of his needs, held as under: - "5. Learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiffs, Mr. S.N. Pungalia strongly opposed these submissions and urged that no substantial question of law arises in the present second appeal and the finding of facts returned by the courts below are based on cogent and relevant evidence and the second appeal deserves to be dismissed as the bona fide need of the landlord was fully established before the learned trial court and as per the catenae of judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is not for the tenant to dictate the landlord as to how and in what manner he should satisfy his bona fide need for his business place and from the facts found by the courts below it was clear that the very source of livelihood of plaintiffs was the STD PCO Booth, which is presently run under the staircase and they need bigger premises for carrying out this business. 6. Having heard the learned counsels and upon perusal of the impugned orders passed by learned courts below, this Court is of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court and the present second appeal is liable to be dismissed and same is accordingly dismissed." 8. 6. Having heard the learned counsels and upon perusal of the impugned orders passed by learned courts below, this Court is of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court and the present second appeal is liable to be dismissed and same is accordingly dismissed." 8. In Prativa Devi v. T.V. Krishnan - (1996) 5 SCC 353 , the three Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court while holding that the landlord is the best judge of his residential requirement observed as under:- "The landlord is the best judge of his residential requirement. He has a complete freedom in the matter. It is no concern of the courts to dicate to the landlord how and in what manner, he should live or to prescribe for him a residential standard of their own. The High Court was rather solicitous about the age of the appellant and thought that because of her age she needed to be looked after. That was a lookout of the appellant and not of the High Court. The gratuitous advice given by the High Court was uncalled for. There is nothing to sh ow that she had any kind of right whatever to stay in the house of the family friend. On the other hand, she was there merely by sufferance. There is no law which deprives the landlord of the beneficial enjoyment of his property. The High Court was in error in laying down that the test is availability of alternative accommodation and not the legal right to such occupation in adjudging the bonafides of the claim of the landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act. In considering the availability of alternative accommodation, the Court has to consider not merely whether such accommodation is available but also whether the landlord has a legal right to such accommodation. The appellant had established her bona fide personal requirement of the demised premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act and her claim could not be disallowed merely on the ground that she was staying as a guest with a family friend by force of circumstances." 9. The appellant had established her bona fide personal requirement of the demised premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act and her claim could not be disallowed merely on the ground that she was staying as a guest with a family friend by force of circumstances." 9. More over, as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court itself in a recent decision of two Judges bench in Satyawati Sharam v. Union of India - (2008) 5 SCC 287 , which has been later on reaffirmed by three Judges bench decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Maharashtra & anr. v. Super Max International Private Ltd. & Ors. - (2009) 9 SCC 772 in which the Hon'ble Apex Court has clearly noticed that even the trend of Apex Court has shifted from pro-tenant from 1950s to 1990s to pro-landlord from 1990s onwards. The relevant extracts from the judgments in case of Satyawati Sharma (supra) & Super Max International Pvt. Ltd. are quoted below for ready reference:- "12. There has been a definite shift in the court's approach while interpreting the rent control legislations. An analysis of the judgments of 1950s to early 1990s would indicate that in majority of cases the courts heavily leaned in favour of an interpretation which would benefit the tenant. In these cases the Court consistently held that the paramount object of every rent control legislation is to provide safeguard for tenants against exploitation by landlords who seek to take undue advantage of the pressing need for accommodation of a large number of people looking for a house on rent for residence or business in the background of acute scarcity thereof. However, a different trend is clearly discernible in the later judgments." The relevant para 71 of the judgment of Apex Court in Super Max International (P) Ltd. (supra) is quoted below for ready reference: "71.We reaffirm the views expressed in Satyawati Sharma and emphasise the need for a more balanced and objective approach to the relationship between the landlord and tenant. This is not to say that the Court should lean in favour of the landlord but merely that there is no longer any room for the assumption that all tenants, as a class, are in dire circumstances and in desperate need of the Court's protection under all circumstances. (The case of the present appellant who is in occupation of an area of 9000 sq. ft. (The case of the present appellant who is in occupation of an area of 9000 sq. ft. in a building, situate at Fort, Mumbai on a rental of Rs. 5236.58/-,plus water charges at the rate of Rs. 515.35/- per month more than amply highlights the point)" 10. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is satisfied that both the courts below had not committed any error in granting the eviction decree in favour of landlord/plaintiffs/respondents as the courts below have rightly appreciated the correct legal position that the landlord is the best judge of his/her business needs and neither the defendant/tenant can dictate terms in this regard and, thus the Issue No.2 with regard to bona fide need of the landlord, has rightly been decided in favour of plaintiffs by the courts below. This Court is satisfied that the present second appeal of the appellants/defendants/tenant deserves to be dismissed and no substantial questions of law arises in the present case. The appeal, is liable to be dismisse, the same is accordingly, dismissed. 11. In the circumstances, it is directed that the appellants/defendants/appellants/tenant shall hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit property in question to the respondent landlord on or before 31.12.2017 and shall pay mesne profit @ Rs. 5,000/- per month commencing from the month of March, 2016 and will further continue to pay the mesne profit each month by 15th day of the next succeeding month or in advance to the respondent-landlord also and in case there is any default in payment of mesne profit, the period for eviction shall stand reduced and the decree of eviction would become executable forthwith. The defendants-tenant shall also clear all the arrears of rent and mesne profits and pay the same to the respondent-landlord within three months from today, otherwise the same will bear interest @9% per annum. The defendants/tenant shall also not sub-let, assign or part with the possession of the suit shop or any part thereof in favour of any one else and would not create any third party interest in the same during the aforesaid period and if it is so done, the same would be treated as void. The defendants-tenant shall furnish a written undertaking incorporating the aforesaid conditions in the trial court within one month and one copy thereof along with affidavit, in this Court. The defendants-tenant shall furnish a written undertaking incorporating the aforesaid conditions in the trial court within one month and one copy thereof along with affidavit, in this Court. It is made clear that if the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit premises is not handed over to the respondent-landlord within the stipuluated time period i.e. on or before 31.12.2017 or mesne profits are not paid as directed above, besides the expeditious execution of the decree in normal course, the respondents-landlord shall also be entitled to invoke the contempt jurisdiction of this Court. No costs. A copy of this judgment be sent to both the learned Courts below and the parties concerned forthwith.