JUDGMENT : Heard Mr. Arijit Bhowmik alongwith Mr. Anujit Dey, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. A. Sengupta, learned Amicus Curiae for the respondents. 2. This is a revision petition filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and order dated 24.09.2014 delivered in Cr.Misc./FC/UDP/19/2014 by the Judge, Family Court, Udaipur, South Tripura, as it then was. 3. By this revision petition, the judgment dated 24.09.2014 has been questioned as the quantum as determined by the Family Court, according to the petitioner is disproportionate to his income as his total income from all sources is Rs. 3,000 per month. How can he be expected to pay a sum of Rs. 3,000 as maintenance to the respondents. However, the respondents in the Family Court, have stated that the petitioner has other sources of income, he is not merely a tapper. 4. Be that as it may, even if the petitioner has no income he cannot shake off his responsibility of maintaining his legally married wife and the child born in the said wed-lock. Maintenance of Rs. 1,000 per month is not even price of a bowl of rice now-a-days. The court cannot prune that minimal maintenance granted to the respondents. The petitioner shall earn and pay the maintenance to the respondents in terms of the impugned judgment and order dated 24.09.2014 without fail, else the stern action against him in terms of law would visit. 5. This petition is totally devoid of merit and accordingly the same is dismissed. 6. A copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties. Mr. A. Sengupta, learned counsel shall receive a sum of Rs. 3,000 (rupees three thousand) for appearing as Amicus Curiae for the respondents in this case. He shall raise the bill to the Law Department and they shall pay him the same within a period of 1(one) month from the date of submission of the bill.