JUDGMENT Heard Sri Shiv Shankar Prasad, holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel representing the State respondents as well as Sri R.C. Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5. This public interest litigation has been instituted seeking a direction for the convening of an open meeting of the Gram Panchayat Khanpur Chitrawal for allotment of a new fair price shop. The prayers have been made in the backdrop of the fair price shop of the sixth respondent having been cancelled. From the material placed on the record, it further transpires that the sixth respondent has challenged the order of cancellation in an appeal which is pending before the fourth respondent. In the said appeal, an application for stay and interim directions has also been made by the respondent No. 6 which is pending consideration before the appellate authority. We note that the actions which are liable to be taken in the contingency of a licence of a fair price shop dealer having been cancelled has been duly provisioned for in the Government Order dated 26 November 2014. The issue stands duly addressed in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the said Government Order. Admittedly, during the pendency of the appeal preferred by the sixth respondent, the card holders have been attached to another fair price shop dealer. We find no material on the record which may lend substance to the apprehension of the petitioner that the respondents shall not take further steps in accordance with the provisions of the Government Order dated 26 November 2014. Accordingly, we refuse to entertain the instant writ petition and leave it open to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority for taking further steps in terms of the Government Order dated 26 November 2014. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.