JUDGMENT : U.C. DHYANI, J. 1. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners seek to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents no. 1 & 2 to provide protection to the petitioners from respondent no. 3. 2. Both the petitioners are present in person before the Court, duly identified by their counsel Mr. Tej Singh Bisht. Both the petitioners are major. The documents brought on record bear testimony of this fact. It is urged by learned counsel of the petitioners that respondent no. 3 is against the marriage of the petitioners and, therefore, the petitioners have sought a relief of protection from this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the State gave the statement that since the petitioners are major, and as per the documents brought on record they have married to each other, therefore, necessary protection shall be granted to them, if they approach for the same. Petitioner no. 2 has already moved an application (annexure-3) to the respondent no. 1 on 25.01.2016. 4. Considering the facts narrated as above, as also the statement given by learned AGA, writ petition is allowed at the admission stage itself by directing the respondents no. 1 & 2 to provide protection to the petitioners on usual terms. 5. Although there appears to be no reason to respondent no. 3 to feel aggrieved against this Order of protection, but assuming that he has some grievance, liberty is granted to him to move for recall of this Order. 6. Both the applications (Urgency Application as well as Interim Relief Application) stand disposed of. 7. Let a copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioners today itself on payment of usual charges.