ORDER : The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the respondents to order re-investigation in the case in Crime No.714 of 2004 pending on the file of the sixth respondent police to be done by the fourth respondent police. 2. Heard Mr. R. Anand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. S. Prabha, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents. 3. On 17.06.2004, a lorry driver, who was transporting sand, had produced a fake document as if the Mines Department had given him permission to quarry and transport certain amount of sand. In connection with the incident, a case in Crime No. 714 of 2004 for the offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 417 IPC was registered against one Ranjith Raj on the complaint of one Subramani, the Deputy Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk. Investigation in Crime No.714 of 2004 has been conducted and a closure report has been filed on 25.08.2008 closing the case on ground that the impugned document was not received from the Forensic Department. In this connection, now in the year 2016, the present petitioner wants this Court to order re-investigation of Crime No.714 of 2004 alleging that the police have wrongly closed the case as 'undetected' in order to favour the accused. 4. The petitioner is admittedly a Contractor by profession and he is not the defacto complainant. Though locus standi is foreign Criminal Law and anyone can set the Criminal Law in motion, yet that does not mean that the petitioner, who is completely an outsider, can be given liberty to challenge a prosecution of the year 2004, which was closed for some reason or other in the year 2008, to resurrect the same via this Criminal Original Petition in the year 2016 and the same will amount to abuse of process of law. P.N. PRAKASH, J. 5. In view of the undue delay, I am not inclined to admit this Criminal Original Petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed.