JUDGMENT : U.C. DHYANI, J. 1. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner seeks to issue direction to the Court of Sessions Judge, Champawat, to decide the Sessions Trial No. 1 of 2015, pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Champawat, relating to the offence under Sections 302, 201 of IPC, P.S. Banbasa, District Champawat, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Upon submission of charge-sheet, charge for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 IPC was framed against the applicant and co-accused Idris Ahmad on 04.02.2015. The session trial was fixed for 24.02.2015 for prosecution evidence. Since then, the session trial is being posted for the same. During the interregnum, four prosecution witnesses have been examined. 3. The innocuous prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Sessions Judge may kindly be directed to decide the session trial at an early date. 4. It is the submission of learned AGA that as many as 53 prosecution witnesses are to be examined by the prosecution, which is likely to take time. 5. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned Trial Court should adhere to the provisions of Section 309 Cr. P.C. while postponing or adjourning the proceedings. The petitioner is an under-trial and is in jail since 2014. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is an under-trial prisoner, the innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner is worth accepting. 7. Writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage by directing the Sessions Judge, Champawat to make an endeavour to decide the pending sessions trial of the under-trial prisoner as expeditiously as possible, without inordinate delay and without granting unnecessary adjournments to the parties.