Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 4007 (ALL)

GAUTAM MOTORS PVT. LTD. v. U. P. POWER CORPORATION LTD.

2016-12-14

K.J.THAKER, SUDHIR AGARWAL

body2016
JUDGMENT By the Court.—Heard Shri Deepak Kumar Pandy holding brief of Shri B.C. Rai, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Shrawan Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondents and perused the record. 2. By means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India following reliefs have been sought: “(A) to issue a writ of Certiorari quashing the report dated 19.2.2004 (Annexure 8) and the consequent bill recovery of Rs. 5,93,227/- (Annexure 9) in respect of installation No. HP - 24 situate at Bharwa Sumerpur, Dist. Hamirpur (U.P.). (B) to issue a writ of prohibition restraining the respondents from recovering Rs. 5,93,227/- on the basis of the inspection report dated 19.2.2004 (Annexure 8) and the consequent bill received on 18.3.2004 (Annexure 9). (C) to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant adjustment of the excess amount of Rs. 1.00 lakh realized from the petitioner pursuant to Annexure-3. (D) to grant any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (E) to award the cost of writ petition.” 3. The only question raised in this writ petition is whether electricity bill can be raised on the basis of check meter or not. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner stated that there is no such provision and also relied on following authorities in support of his submission : (i) Smt. Amrawati Devi v. Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and another, 2009(1) ADJ 430 (DB); (ii) Belwal Spinning Mills Ltd. and others v. U.P. State Electricity Board and another, (1997) 6 SCC 740 ; and (iii) Tata Hydro-Electric Power Supply Co. Ltd. and others v. Union of India, (2003) 4 SCC 172 . 5. Learned counsel for U.P. Power Corporation Limited very fairly admitted that there is no provision either under U.P. Electricity Supply Code or the Electricity Act, 2003 that electricity bill can be raised on the basis of check meter. 6. In view thereof, writ petition is allowed and impugned demand dated 19.2.2004 (Annexure 8) and the consequent bill for recovery of Rs. 5,93,227/- (Annexure 9) are hereby set aside.