JUDGMENT : Hemant Gupta, J. I.A. No. 891 of 2015 This interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of the delay of 117 days in preferring the present Letters Patent Appeal. We are satisfied with the reasons assigned for the delay in filing the present appeal and allow this application. The delay is condoned. 2. I.A. No. 891 of 2015 stands disposed of. L.P.A. No. 193 of 2015. 3-4. The order dated 7th July, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 9407 of 2014 is under challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The challenge was to the laying of Paradeep-Haldia-Barauni Crude Oil Pipeline crossing through the village-Maranchi-Hatidah in the district of Patna. 5. The argument of learned counsel for the appellant is that the pipeline is on a land close to dwelling houses. Therefore, in terms of Section 7 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the pipeline cannot be laid down. 6. On the other hand, in the counter affidavit filed before the learned Single Judge, it was pointed out that the land was acquired for public purpose through the Notification dated 22.08.1963, issued under Section 3(i) of the Act followed by the declaration as contemplated under Section 6 of the Act. The pipeline is passing through 20 villages on either sides of the river Ganga and no land holder except of that of the village Maranchi has raised any objection and that laying of pipeline has been completed without any difficulty. It is further pointed out that the first pipeline was laid in the year 1964 itself, the second was laid in and around 1980 and the third pipeline is being laid presently to meet the growing needs and in view of the low cost in transporting the crude. 7. We do not find any merit in the argument raised on behalf of the appellant. The land was acquired way back in the year 1964 for the purpose of laying down pipeline, where after two pipelines have already been laid, and now the objection raised at this stage when the third pipeline is being laid is not at all permissible. We do not find any error in the proposed laying down of pipeline which is in national interest. 8. We do not find any error in the proposed laying down of pipeline which is in national interest. 8. We are not inclined to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge passed in CWJC No. 9407 of 2014 on 07.07.2014. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.