JUDGMENT : M.V. Muralidaran, J. 1. The writ petitioner by namely Suyambu, who is the President of the Chidmbarapuram- Jacobpuram Panchayat has filed the present writ petition seeking prayer to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order passed by the Respondent in Roc. A8/1929/2013, dated 15.07.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the Respondent herein to implement the order dated 02.07.2014 in proceedings No. A8/1929/2013. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the President and Executive Authority of Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat, Chidambarapuram, Valliyoor Panchayat Union, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District and he filed the present writ petition as Public Interest Litigation. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that as per the G.O.Ms. No. 1959 RD and LA Department dated 24.09.1964, the Government of Tamilnadu has issued order by bifurcated the existing Pazhavoor Panchayat, Tirunelveli District and constituted two separate Panchayat namely, Pazhavoor and Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram and the said notification was passed on 23.12.1064 thereby mentioning the description of Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat with four blocks. 4. He also come forward by saying that the Village Panchayat of Chidambarapuram- Jacobpuram, is started functioning in the year 1965 with four blocks and three wards. Due to the introduction of multi member wards system in the year 2009, the number of ward has been increased from 3 to 9 and the details of the blocks and the wards of the said Village Panchayat namely, Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram details hereunder:- S. No. Name of Streets Old Ward No. New Ward No. 1. Chidambarapuram North of South Street, Chidambarapuram - Hamlet 1 1, 2 and 3 2. Chidambarapuram South of South Street, Chidambarapuram - Hamlet 2 5 and 6 3. Jacobpuram East of C.S.I. Church and Marankulam, Harijan Colony - Jacobpuram and Marankulam - Hamlets 3 7 and 84 and 9 5. After reformation of Panchayat Wards, Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat, which originally consists of 3 wards under multi number wards system was reformed with 9 wards. Out of 9 Wards, Ward Nos. I, II, III, V and VI are called Chidambarapuram Hamlet and Ward Nos. VII and VIII are called as Jacobpuram Hamlet and Ward Nos. IV and IX are called as Marankulam Hamlet. The entire Government Records and various Court Orders were established the same. 6. Out of 9 Wards, Ward Nos. I, II, III, V and VI are called Chidambarapuram Hamlet and Ward Nos. VII and VIII are called as Jacobpuram Hamlet and Ward Nos. IV and IX are called as Marankulam Hamlet. The entire Government Records and various Court Orders were established the same. 6. The writ petitioner also states that while being so, one Ex-Village Panchayat President namely Paramanantharaj, resident of New Ward No. V (Old Ward No. II) of Chidambarapuram, who is a Christian has passed an illegal resolution No. 3/88-89 dated 18.04.1988 with an oblique motive to change the existing name of Chidambarapuram as Jacobpuram in New Ward No. V (Old Ward No. II). The said resolution passed by the Ex-Village Panchayat President dated 18.04.1988 is arbitrary and illegal and as against the Government Orders and the notification and the same was objected by the Villagers of Chidambarapuram. 7. The writ petitioner also made averments in his affidavit that some of the Christian wanted to call the village name as Jacobpuram instead of Chidambarapuram in respect of New Ward No. V (Old Ward No. II). The said problems were started only because of the illegal resolution dated 18.04.1988 of Ex-President to change the existing name of Chidambarapuram into Jacobpuram in New Ward No. V (Old Ward No. II). He has also made averments that it is settled position that the village name of Chidambarapuram has to be called only in consonance with the Government Orders and the notification made there under and not by passing an illegal resolution contrary to the Government Orders. But, the Ex-Village President passed a resolution contrary to the Government Orders, which made a communal rift between Hindus and Christians in the village of Chidambarapuram. But, the Ex-Village President passed a resolution contrary to the Government Orders, which made a communal rift between Hindus and Christians in the village of Chidambarapuram. Since the said Paramanantharaj, who was the Ex-President of the said village Panchayat, who belongs to the Christian wanted the Village name as Jacobpuram instead of Chidambarapuram and in order to change the Hamlet name as Jacobpuram instead of Chidambarapuram one Jebaraj and two others were filed a representative suit in O.S. No. 185 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Valliyoor, seeking prayer for the declaration, declaring that the Ward No. II should be called as Jacobpuram and prayed for mandatory injunction to implement the resolution dated 18.04.1988, but the said suit has been dismissed, subsequently it was confirmed by this Court in S.A. (MD) No. 492 of 2008. 8. The writ petitioner also come forward by saying that after dismissal of the said Second Appeal one Mr. Thomas native of Jacobpuram has made a representation to the Principal Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu to change the village name as Jacobpuram instead of Chidambarapuram in respect of New Ward No. V (Old Ward No. II), but the said representation was rejected. Thereafter some of the social elements were acting against the interest of general public and wanted to write the name of Jacobpuram instead of Chidambarapuram in the Village Panchayat Office. 9. The writ petitioner also states that on 06.01.2013 some of the persons belonging to the Christian group of Jacobpuuram has entered into Panchayat Office and erased the village name board with an oil paint, which was originally written as Chidambarapuram- Jacobpuram Panchayat Office at Chidambarapuram, Valliyoor Panchayat Union, Tirunelveli District and the said act is against the order of the Government as well as the various Court orders and hence criminal cases were registered against the said persons in Crime Nos. 3, 4 and 5 of 2013 and the F.I.R. was registered. In that F.I.R. one Thomas was also arrayed as an accused for creating communal clash between the two villagers. 10. The case of the said persons are only with an aim to lead to religious violence between Hindus and Christian, the Hindus wanted the existing village name as Chidambarapuram in the name of Panchayat Board and also seeking for the change of name as Jacobpuram instead of Chidambarapuram. 10. The case of the said persons are only with an aim to lead to religious violence between Hindus and Christian, the Hindus wanted the existing village name as Chidambarapuram in the name of Panchayat Board and also seeking for the change of name as Jacobpuram instead of Chidambarapuram. In fact, the Hindu people belongs to Chidambarapuram wanted the existing village name as Chidambarapuram are to be re-written in the erased places in accordance with the Government Orders. Due to the above said act of erasing the name of Panchayat Board, one Stalin has filed the writ petition before this Court in WP (MD) No. 3601 of 2013 seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus to write the name of Chidambarapuram in Village Panchayat Office situated at New Ward No. V (Old Ward No. II) and also to write the name of Chidambarapuram in all Government Building in respect of Ward Nos. I, II, III, V and VI and to record the name of the Chidambarapuram in all the Government Department records. The said respondent predecessor has filed a detailed counter affidavit in Para No. 10 is as follows:- "10. I further submit that in the history of the Panchayat the Ward No. 2 (old) is not called as Jacobpuram North Street at any point of time instead the name Chidambarapuram South to South Street is in existence right from the inception year 1965. In this connection it is submitted that the action of the then President Thiru. V. Paramanandaraj and resident of Ward No. 2 in having passed a Resolution in 1988 to change name of Ward No. 2 as Jacobpuram North Street goes to prove that the Chidambarapuram is the original and real name for Ward No. 2 right from 1965 and there is no Government Order changing this name yet. The decrees and judgments in O.S. No. 7/2001 and O.S. No. 185/2001 confirm the above version. In view of the circumstances explained in the foregoing paras and due to the fact that the Panchayat Office is situated in Old Ward No. 2 (New Ward No. 5) it is necessary to write the following in the name board available in the Petitioner Office. In view of the circumstances explained in the foregoing paras and due to the fact that the Panchayat Office is situated in Old Ward No. 2 (New Ward No. 5) it is necessary to write the following in the name board available in the Petitioner Office. "Panchayat Office, Chidambarapuram – Jacobpuram Panchayat Chidambarapuram, Panchayat Union, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District" It is also submitted that in order to avoid complications and to maintain peace in future it has also became necessary to write the name Chidambarapuram in all Government Buildings available in New Wards I, II, III, V and VI of the said Panchayat (Old Wards 1 & 2) and also to record the name of Chidambarapuram in all Government Department Office records in respect of the above wards. As keeping the Public Office (Panchayat Office) without name board for months together is not conducive for the efficient administration, there is imperative need to put up fresh name board in the office as described in Para 10 supra. In view of the Collectors proceedings dated 03.08.2008 based on the various court orders, and letter of Principal Secretary to the Government dated 20.12.2011 the name Chidambarapuram in all Government Buildings may be continued and the petition may kindly be disposed and thus render justice." 11. Considering the counter affidavit filed by the respondent in para-10 mentioned supra, this Court by an order dated 26.09.2013 has disposed the writ petition by recording the Para-10 of the said counter affidavit. Apart from this, one another person by namely Pallikondaperumal has filed the writ petition in W.P. (MD) No. 13150 of 2013 before this Court seeking a direction against the respondent to record the name of the village at Chidambarapuram in respect of Ward Nos. I and II for issuance of Aadhar Card and the said writ petition also disposed of on 26.08.2013 and the learned Single Judge of this Court has passed the order that the petitioner’s village of Chidambarapuram in respect of Ward Nos. I, II, III, V and VI (Old Ward Nos. I and II) should be called as Chidambarapuram village. In respect of Ward Nos. VII and VIII are to be called as Jacobpuram village and in respect of Ward Nos. I, II, III, V and VI (Old Ward Nos. I and II) should be called as Chidambarapuram village. In respect of Ward Nos. VII and VIII are to be called as Jacobpuram village and in respect of Ward Nos. IV and IX to be called as Marankulam village, since the order passed in W.P. (MD) No. 3601 of 2013 has not complied, the said writ petitioner Stalin has filed a Contempt Petition before this Court for implementing the order dated 26.09.2013 and the respondent also entered appearance through the Government Pleader and submitted that the orders were complied with on or before 02.07.2014 and recording the said submission, the Contempt Petition was closed. 12. The writ petitioner also states that after considering all the Government Orders and as well as the order of the Court, the respondent has passed a proceedings by his communication No. A8/1929/2013 dated 02.07.2014 has directed the petitioner to write the Village name as Chidambarapuram in the Panchayat Office situated at Old Ward No. II at Chidambarauram and also at all the Government Buildings. As per the direction of the District Collector dated 02.07.2014, the writ petitioner attempting to write the village name as Chidambarapuram in the Panchayat Office and also in other Government places, the petitioner received a life threat from the Anti Rival Elements and hence the writ petitioner again approached this Court by filing the writ petition in WP (MD) No. 11460 of 2014 seeking police protection to write the village name as Chidambarapuram in respect of the above said Wards. This Court also by an order dated 14.07.2014 has disposed the above writ petition by directing the Inspector of Police, Pazhavoor Police Station to consider the writ petitioner’s request, that was passed on the order of the respondent dated 02.07.2014. When the matter stood thus, some of the persons namely C. Thomas, S. Arthur Selvakumar and other high profiles approached the respondent on 15.07.2014 to cancel the order dated 02.07.2014 passed by the respondent and immediately on the same date, the respondent District Collector has a mala-fide intention with an ulterior purpose passed the order on 15.07.2014 and kept his own order dated 02.07.2014 in abeyance. Therefore, the order of the District Collector has passed by stating that due to re-writing of the name of the Village panchayat as Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat at Chidambarapuram, there will be a law and order problem arose. Therefore, the order of the District Collector has passed by stating that due to re-writing of the name of the Village panchayat as Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat at Chidambarapuram, there will be a law and order problem arose. 13. The writ petitioner further states that in the interest of the public, it is duty cast upon the District Collector to take appropriate action to implement his own order dated 02.07.2014, but the respondent is not taking any action in this regard for the past two years. The Peace Committee was also held on 11.08.2014, which has been decided within 13 days the appropriate orders will be passed to write the names as Chidambarapuram in respect of Ward No. V (Old Ward No. II). But, thereafter no action was taken. Therefore, the writ petitioner has given a representation to the District Collector on 23.05.2016, but no action was taken. Therefore, the writ petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the District Collector in ROC. A8/1929/2013 dated 15.07.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent/District Collector to implement his own order dated 02.07.2014. 14. As per the direction of this Court, the Superintendent of Police Tirunelveli has filed the Status Report dated 09.08.2016 in which he has stated that for the past 30 years there are several complaints given each other, who are belongs to the native of Jacobpuram and Chidambarapuram and several cases are pending against them. 15. The fourth respondent Mr. E. Thomas has filed his counter by denying all the averments in the writ petition. The second respondent stating that there was no public interest involved in the said writ petition and as such the present impugned order dated 15.07.2014 was passed by the District Collector, even the impugned decision having the public peace and amity in mind and by reason of the pendency of the civil cases and the writ petitions on the issue of the naming of the Panchayat Village. 16. The fourth respondent also states that the writ petitioner suppressed the filing of the Writ Petition in W.P. No. 27712 of 2012 before the Principal Bench of this Court against the order of the Principal Secretary to the Government, rejecting the second respondent’s representation and the same is pending. 16. The fourth respondent also states that the writ petitioner suppressed the filing of the Writ Petition in W.P. No. 27712 of 2012 before the Principal Bench of this Court against the order of the Principal Secretary to the Government, rejecting the second respondent’s representation and the same is pending. The second respondent also states that the filing of the Writ Petition in W.P. No. 3601 of 2013 by one Stalin and the said writ petition was filed either by impleading the second respondent or any other representatives of the Jacobpuram by suppressing the real facts and after disposal of the said writ petition on 26.08.2013, the said Mr. Stalin, has threatened the Government Official to implement the order. 17. The fourth respondent also states that the Ward No. 2 mentioned as Jacobpuram North Street is a predominantly Christian area and that the Tirunelveli Diocese has established a Church and a School more than a century ago and that now the Schools is also upgraded as a High School. The said school caters to the needs of students from both the community. Besides, the Panchayat Office and library is situated within the Ward No. 2 bearing the name of Jacobpuram and that few inimical elements in the Chidambarapuram area created problem to delete the same. Though the second respondent has filed review petition in the above writ petition in WP No. 3601 of 2013 dated 26.08.2013. The said writ petition was closed, since no order was passed in favour of the said Stalin. However by misinterpreting the in various orders and counter, the first respondent was forced to issue proceedings on 02.07.2014, but without hearing the other parties, including the second respondent on knowing about the same, the second respondent given a representation to the first respondent/District Collector and on considering his representation, the District Collector has passed the present impugned order dated 15.07.2014. 18. The fourth respondent also states that in his counter, it is only this writ petitioner who erased the name board of the Panchayat naming Jacobpuram, have not done any unruly practise except questioning the high handed attitudes of the petitioner to bring the name of Chidambarapuram Panchayat. Similarly, false complaints has also preferred against the second respondent Thomas and others, where they facing the criminal consequences. Similarly, false complaints has also preferred against the second respondent Thomas and others, where they facing the criminal consequences. After the order dated 02.07.2014, the second respondent and others immediately preferred a representation to the first respondent/District Collector and staged Dharna by excommunicating themselves from going inside the village. At that time, they have not created any law and order problem, but the second respondent and others only agitated in a democratic manner. Only after considering the seriousness, the first respondent/District Collector has passed impugned order dated 15.07.2014 and kept his order in abeyance. The fourth respondent also states that the writ petitioner alone causing the law and order problem, due to the political pressure. 19. The fourth respondent also filed a re-joinder affidavit and in his rejoinder it is stated that the old ward No. 2, which is in dispute, included Survey Nos.84 and 85 and the said Survey Numbers have been described as Jacobpuram in the village map which was prepared in the year 1914 and till date the said area has been described as Jacobpuram in all the revenue records and pursuant to that, all the Government buildings and the Panchayat buildings have been referred as Jacobpuram. The Government Library, which was started in the year 1999 has been located in Ward No. 2 and has been called as Jacobpuram Branch Office. Till date the said post office is functioning in old Ward No. 2 as Jacobpuram Post. The Anganvadi building is also is also situated in Old Ward No. 2 referring itself as Jacobpuram and the Panchayat building before its renovation have carried in the name of Jacobpuram, in all these records Ward No. 2 has been indisputedly called as Jacobpuram from the inception of the Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Village Panchayat. 20. The fourth respondent also states that the voter I.D. card, Ration card, Aadhar card, Electricity Bills, Driving licence, Passport of all the people residing in Old Ward No. 2 has been given in the name of Jacobpuram. Therefore, he prayed this Court for dismissal of this writ petition. 21. Heard Mr. B. Saravanan, learned counsel for Mr. G. Mathavan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. G. Prabhurajadurai, learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent. 22. Therefore, he prayed this Court for dismissal of this writ petition. 21. Heard Mr. B. Saravanan, learned counsel for Mr. G. Mathavan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr. G. Prabhurajadurai, learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent. 22. On perusal of the records, we came to know that the Superintendent of Police has filed a detailed Status Report and in para-7 he has stated that originally a civil suit was filed by the Chidambarapuram people in O.S. No. 7 of 2001 before the District Munsif Court, Valliyoor, for the relief that the receipts for water tax and house tax should be given as Chidambarapuram and the suit was allowed by the same Court in favour of the plaintiffs. Against the said decree, the Jacobpuram people filed a suit in O.S. No. 304 of 2006 for declaring that the judgment in O.S. No. 7 of 2001 is null and void. Subsequently, in the judgment in the suit in O.S. No. 7 of 2001 is null and void, because the said suit was filed as collusive one, more over the District Collector and Christians were not added as parties in that suit. Pursuant to the above, a writ petition has been filed before this Court by one Pallikonda Perumal seeking prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to record the name of the village of the petitioner as Chidambarapuram Panchayat in respect of Ward Nos. 1 and 2 of Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat in Aadhar card enrolment and the said writ petition was disposed by the learned Single Judge dated 26.08.2013 and the said writ petition, the order was passed based on the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 7 of 2001. In the report filed by the 7th respondent in para-7 stated as follows: "7. I humbly submit that the Hindus in the Chidambarapuram people filed a suit in O.S. No. 7/2001 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Valliyoor for the relief that the receipts for water tax and house tax should be given as Chidambarapuram. The suit was allowed by the District Munsif Court, Valliyoor in favour of the plaintiffs as prayed for. The suit was allowed by the District Munsif Court, Valliyoor in favour of the plaintiffs as prayed for. Aggrieved over the same, the Christian of the Jacobpuram filed writ petition in W.P. (MD) No. 5506 of 2006 and W.P. (MD) No. 5510 of 2006 before this Hon’ble Court and the same were dismissed by this Hon’ble Court on 10.07.2006. Then the Christian of the Jacobpuram filed a suit in O.S. No. 304 of 2006 for declaring that the judgment in O.S. No. 7 of 2006 is null and void. Subsequently in the judgment in the suit in O.S. No. 304 of 2006 stated that the judgment in O.S. No. 7 of 2006 is null and void because the said suit was filed as collusive one more over the District Collector and Christians were not added as parties in that suit." 23. We also noticed that one Mr. Vetrivel Nadar and others were filed a suit in O.S. No. 7 of 2001 before the Additional District Munsif Court, Valliyoor, by impleading the Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat President alone and they have not impleading any representative belongs to the Jacobpuram, since the plaintiff in O.S. No. 7 of 2001 are all belongs to the Chidambarapuram village, and the said Additional District Munsif Court, Valliyoor, has passed a decree and judgment in O.S. No. 7 of 2001, on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Valliyoor, which reads as follows: xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 24. Pursuant to the above decree, the Secretary to Government also passed an order on 20.12.2011. In the said orders, it is stated as follows: xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 25. Originally the first respondent/District Collector has passed the order on 02.07.2014 by stating that as per the order passed by this Court in WP (MD) No. 3601 of 2013, dated 26.09.13 and the Review Application SR. No. 21 of 2014, dated 09.04.2014 in the Panchayat Office in Old Ward No. 2, New Ward No. 5, the name of the Panchayat office has written as Panchayat Office, Chidambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchyat, Chidambarapuram Panchayat Union, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District. 26. The said order dated 02.07.2014 reads as follows: "Hence, it is ordered, as per the judgment in W.P. (MD) No. 3601 of 2013, dated 26.09.2013 and the judgment based upon Review Application SR. 26. The said order dated 02.07.2014 reads as follows: "Hence, it is ordered, as per the judgment in W.P. (MD) No. 3601 of 2013, dated 26.09.2013 and the judgment based upon Review Application SR. No. 21 of 2014 on 09.04.2014 as in the office of the village panchayat (old ward No. 2, New Warrd No. 5) "Panchayat Office, Chitambarapuram-Jacobpuram Panchayat, Chitambarapuram, Panchayat Union, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District And it is also ordered as in the name of "Chitambarapuram" in the Government buildings and Government (offices) documents that we situated in Ward No. i, ii, iii, v and vi (old ward No. 1 & 2)." 27. After that, a representation was given by the second respondent/Mr. Thomas and one S. Arthur Selvakumar to the first respondent/District Collector and the first respondent has passed the present impugned order in Roc. A8/1929/2013 dated 15.07.2014 is as follows: "On 15.07.2014 a representation has been received from Thiru. E. Thomas & Thiru. S. Arthur Selvakumar regarding the order passed by District Collector in the reference 2nd cited. In view of this representation and the impending danger of law and order problem the above said order is hereby kept in abeyance until further order from this office." 28. This present impugned order dated 15.07.2014 has been passed by the District Collector, who is the District Executive Magistrate having power to control the law and order problem and passed this present impugned order by ordering to kept in abeyance of the earlier order passed by the District Collector dated 02.07.2014 until further orders. Therefore, the order passed by the District Collector, dated 15.07.2014 is valid in the eye of law and this Court having no jurisdiction to questioning the order passed by the first respondent/District Collector dated 15.07.2014, since the learned District Munsif Court, Valliyoor by judgment in O.S. No. 304 of 2006 dated 30.09.2013, has set aside the decree in O.S. No. 7 of 2001, it made clear that the Court has passed the following orders as follows:- "In the result this suit is decreed with cost in the following term, 1. It is hereby declared that the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 7/01 on the file of the Additional District Munsif court, Valliyoor is null and void and 2. Consequential permanent injunction is granted directing the 6th defendant not to enforce the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 7/01 in any manner." 29. It is hereby declared that the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 7/01 on the file of the Additional District Munsif court, Valliyoor is null and void and 2. Consequential permanent injunction is granted directing the 6th defendant not to enforce the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 7/01 in any manner." 29. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this writ petition by setting aside the order dated 15.07.2014, passed by the District Collector and consequently directing the respondent to implement the order of the District Collector dated 15.07.2014 is not required for the interference by this Court. The order passed by the District Collector dated 15.07.2014 is only on the interest of the Public and also for controlling the law and order problem. Originally, the order passed by this Court in WP (MD) No. 3601 of 2013 dated 26.09.2013 and subsequent order passed by the District Collector on 02.07.2014 is all only based on the decree in O.S. No. 7 of 2001 dated 04.04.2005 which was set aside by the very same Additional District Munsif Court, Valliyoor in O.S. No. 304 of 2006 dated 30.09.2013. Therefore, the order dated 15.07.2014 the impugned in this writ petition is valid and perfect and the writ petitioner has not make out any case before this Court, since the District Collector’s impugned order dated 15.07.2014 is not passed on any illegality, it was passed only to control the law and order problem. Therefore, the impugned order is valid in eye of law. 30. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.