ORDER : Mr. T. Raja, J. 1. Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions are one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order. For better appreciation, facts involved in W.P.No.31848 of 2016 are stated below:- The petitioner Institution is a Licensed Adoption Agency recognised by the Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, Chennai. It is a Charitable Non-profitable Organization with an object to take under its care and custody of the abandoned and surrendered children and to give infants eligible for adoption and then to give them a good future. Whileso, one male child, named Praveen, now known as J.Sairam, who was born on 09.05.2012, was handed over to the petitioner Institution for care and protection on 17.10.2013 as 1 year 5 months 8 days old baby. Thereafter, he was under the care and protection of the petitioner Institution and his health and other general conditions were properly studied and records were also maintained to that effect. In such circumstances, respondents 2 and 3, who are legally married and having no issues, have approached the petitioner Institution and expressed their desire to adopt the said male child. On such consent and willingness, the petitioner Institution, after following the due procedures, had handed over the said child temporarily to the respondents 2 and 3 on 04.02.2014. Subsequently, due to parental care of the respondents 2 and 3, the health condition of the adoptive child has been improved and therefore, the petitioner Institution have accepted to give the said adoptive child in adoption to the said respondents. 2. In view of the above stated circumstances, the petitioner Institution have filed an Adoptive petition in Adoption O.P.No.375 of 2016 before the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore, praying to grant permission to give the male child Praveen now known as J.Sairam for Adoption to the respondents 2 and 3. In support of the said petition, the petitioner Institution have also adduced necessary documents viz. Child Study Report, Physical Examination Report, proceedings of the Chairman (Child Welfare Committee, Coimbatore), Home Study Report, Income Certificate of the adoptive parents, Marriage Certificate of the adoptive parents, etc. Upon considering the entire materials on record, the Court below has allowed the said petition on 10.05.2016 granting permission to the petitioner Institution to give minor child Praveen now known as J.Sairam born on 09.05.2012 in adoption to the respondents 2 and 3. 3. Upon considering the entire materials on record, the Court below has allowed the said petition on 10.05.2016 granting permission to the petitioner Institution to give minor child Praveen now known as J.Sairam born on 09.05.2012 in adoption to the respondents 2 and 3. 3. In view of such order passed by the Court below, the petitioner Institution have approached the first respondent with a representation dated 10.06.2016 requesting to issue birth certificate to the said adopted child, however, the first respondent, by way of impugned order dated 23.06.2016, rejected the same directing the petitioner Institution to approach the Court first and then to file a petition for grant of birth certificate. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner Institution have filed the present writ petitions with a direction to the first respondent to grant birth certificate to those adopted children. 4. Terming the impugned order passed by the first respondent as unfair, improper, illegal and arbitrary, learned counsel for the petitioner Institution submitted that in view of the Circular dated 12.03.2012 issued by the Registrar General of India, the first respondent has to enter the particulars made in the Adoption order and then to issue birth certificate to the Adoption Agency. Therefore, the refusal of the first respondent directing the petitioner Institution to approach the Court to get birth certificate is contrary to the said Circular, thus, he prayed for allowing the writ petitions. 5. On the contrary, learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that as per Rule 13(3) of the Tamil Nadu Registration of Birth and Death Rules (in short "Rules"), any parent, who has failed to register the birth within a year, will have to file a petition before the first respondent only after getting necessary orders from the Judicial Magistrate. However, it is further stated that in view of amendment made to the Rule 13(3) of the Rules, which is extracted below, if the petitioner Institution make an application with necessary documents, they would issue the birth certificate. 6. Amended Rule 9(3) of the Rules notified in G.O.Ms. However, it is further stated that in view of amendment made to the Rule 13(3) of the Rules, which is extracted below, if the petitioner Institution make an application with necessary documents, they would issue the birth certificate. 6. Amended Rule 9(3) of the Rules notified in G.O.Ms. No.293, Health and Family Welfare (AB2) Department, dated 02.12.2016, states thus: "(3) Any birth or death which has not been registered within one year of its occurrence shall be registered by an order of the Executive Magistrate not below the rank of Revenue Divisional Officer." From the above said amended Rules, it is clear that the Executive Magistrate not below the rank of a Revenue Divisional Officer is empowered to register the birth of a child which has not been done within one year of its occurrence, replacing the old rule of directing such persons to approach the Judicial Magistrate for a direction to obtain birth certificate. 7. It is seen that the petitioner Institution runs several homes for mentally challenged people in the name of Sharanalayamm Jyothi, a home for HIV infected people in the name of Sharanayalayam Jeevan, an old age home in the name of Sharanalayam Preetham, a home for children of beggars and street children in the name of Sharanalayam Dhaya, etc. The main object of the said institution is to take them under its custody and care so as to give them a good future. With regard to adoption, they have also followed due procedures before handing over of the children from their homes and in that process, they have also filed an adoption petition before the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore, and upon considering the various documents as stated above, the Court below granted permission to the petitioner Institution to give those minor children in adoption to the respondents 2 and 3 of the respective writ petitions. 8. The nation's children are a supremely important asset. Their nurture and solicitude are our responsibility. Children's programme should find a prominent part in out national plans for the development of human resources, so that our children grow up to become robust citizens, physically fit, mentally alert and morally healthy, endowed with the skills and motivations needed by society. Equal opportunities for development to all children during the period of growth should be our aim, for, this would serve our larger purpose of reducing inequality and ensuring social justice. Equal opportunities for development to all children during the period of growth should be our aim, for, this would serve our larger purpose of reducing inequality and ensuring social justice. Therefore, without appreciating the services rendered by the petitioner Institution in protecting the abandoned children against neglect, cruelty and exploitation as this would ultimately ensure the growth of abandoned children with that of the normal family neighborhood, the first respondent has passed the impugned order refusing to grant birth certificate to those adopted children. 9. Therefore, by virtue of the recent amendment made to the Rule 13(3) of the Rules empowering the Executive Magistrate not below the rank of a Revenue Divisional Officer to register the birth of a child which has not been done within one year of its occurrence, and also taking note of the yeoman services rendered by the petitioner Institution in taking them under its custody and care, this Court directs first respondent to issue birth certificate to the adopted children of respondents 2 and 3 of the respective writ petitions, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 10. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, the writ petitions are allowed, by setting aside the impugned order. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.