JUDGMENT Abhinava Upadhya, J. The proceedings under Section 122-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (in short 'the Act') were initiated against the petitioner and he was found to be in unauthorized possession of Plot No. 188. 2. The petitioner claims that he is not in possession of Plot No. 188 but on 182 and he is being in possession over the same for several years and without any measurement the petitioner has been directed to be evicted and a compensation has been imposed for unauthorized possession of an amount of Rs. 370/-. 3. The said order has been passed after calling a report from the Tehsildar who was examined and proved his report. Under the circumstances, a clear cut finding has been has been recorded that the petitioner is in possession over Plot No. 188 which is a public utility land and has to be evicted. 4. Upon these findings, no interference is called for. If the petitioner has any right over the land in question, he may proceed to get a declaration in that regard for which the remedy is provided under the Act. No relief can be granted under the writ proceeding. 5. The writ petition has no merit. It is, accordingly, dismissed.