Ajit Singh; CJ:-- 1. Mr. H. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of order dated 01.10.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench in O.A. No. 350/2014. 3. Respondent is presently posted in Guwahati as C.T.S.K., C.H, C.R.P.F. His daughter Priya Kumari was married to Rajinder Basfore, but she has reportedly been subjected to domestic violence. Priya Kumari has filed a case bearing No. 239m/2013 against her husband which is pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup. 4. The petitioners vide order dated 27.5.2014 have transferred the respondent from Guwahati to Allahabad. The respondent therefore, filed O.A. No. 350/2014 before the Tribunal seeking relief for being allowed to continue in Guwahati till the decision of domestic violence case of his daughter Priya Kumari. The relief sought by respondent was vehemently opposed by the petitioners, but the Tribunal has directed the petitioners to retain respondent at Guwahati for one year. The Tribunal has so directed because it was of the view that Priya Kumari is not only victim of domestic violence but is also mother of male child of 1 year 4 months and at this juncture of her life, presence of her father (respondent) in Guwahati is extremely necessary. Aggrieved, the petitioners have filed the present petition. 5. It is to be noted that after passing of the impugned order of the Tribunal seven months have already passed. In the fact situation of the case, in all fairness, the petitioners should fairly accommodate respondent in Guwahati for the period directed by the Tribunal. 6. We find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed.