JUDGMENT Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the applicant and Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No. 237 of 2015, which has been registered under Section 376/506 of IPC & under Section 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, Act, at Police Station-Vikasnagar, District-Dehradun. 3. This is the second bail application. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 01.03.2016. 4. The case of the applicant before this Court is that there is absolutely no worthwhile evidence to proceed against the applicant under Section 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, Act. According to the applicant, the prosecutrix has clearly deposed in her cross-examination that she had never taken the name of the present applicant before the Police authority or before any other authority nor even before the learned Magistrate. 5. However, since all these factors were considered at the time of consideration of first bail application of the applicant, repetition of all these same factors would not be relevant in the second bail application. 6. There is no new ground in the second bail application. Second bail application is hereby dismissed. 7. However, learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial in the letter and spirit of Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure without granting any undue adjournment to either of the parties. It is further directed that court below shall complete the trial on day to day hearing. 8. It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of disposal of this bail application and it shall not be taken into consideration at all in any other proceedings.