JUDGMENT Suneet Kumar, J. The applicant has approached this Court assailing the order passed under Section 245 Cr.P.C. upon being summoned for an offence under Section 406 IPC. 2. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant had approached the civil court assailing the document which is the basis of the criminal complaint. It was averred in the complaint that the applicant had taken some money from the respondent which was entered into between the parties on a stamp paper. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that he is a Government servant and there was no occasion for him to approach the second respondent to obtain the sum from the respondent but would admit that both are relatives. 4. This Court at this stage, would not go into the question as to whether document is a forged or genuine document which is subject of evidence, and it cannot be said that the ingredients in the complaint do not make out a case under Section 406 IPC. Mere filing of a civil suit would not mean that the criminal proceedings cannot be proceeded against the applicant. It is not the case of the applicant that the complaint does not disclose the ingredients of the offence under Section 406 IPC. 5. This Court under Article 227 of the Constitution declines to interfere with the matter. The petition being devoid of merit is, accordingly, dismissed. No cost.