Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 623 (RAJ)

Suresh Kumar Saini v. State of Rajasthan

2016-05-04

PANKAJ BHANDARI

body2016
ORDER : Pankaj Bhandari, J. Heard the learned counsel for the accused applicant-petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Counsel for the accused applicant-petitioner has argued that the cheque in question was stolen by the brother of the complainant, for which an FIR was also lodged by the accused-petitioner. 3. Taking note of the above fact and also the fact that disposal of the revision petition would consume time, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused petitioner-applicant. 4. Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence is allowed. It is directed that the accused petitioner applicant Suresh Kumar Saini s/o Sh.Bhagwana Ram shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court on 15.07.2016 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the revision on the conditions indicated below:- 1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the revision is decided. 2. That if the applicants changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. 3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court. 5. In case the said accused applicants does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.