S. Kasirajan v. Deputy Superintendent of Police Madurai District
2016-02-25
P.N.PRAKASH
body2016
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER : This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to secure the real culprits in connection with FIR in Crime No.492 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), appearing for the State. 3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the land in question in Thenoor Village II Bit, is a Natham Promboke and that one Subramani, Karuppayee, Tamilselvan and Chandran have created forged documents as if the property belongs to them and sold it to one Malaisamy by Doc.No.1660 of 2002. In this regard, the petitioner has lodged a complaint, based on which, a case in Crime No.492 of 2015 under Section 420 IPC has been registered by the respondent police. It is also the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police are not property investigating the case in Crime no.492 of 2015 and they are shielding the culprits. 4. Today, the Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District has filed a status report, wherein in Paragraph No.3, it is stated as follows: 3. I further submit that even according to the averments in the petitioner in Para No.3 of the present petition that the Thenoor Panchayat Union has passed resolution dated 01.05.2015 to remove on encroachments in Thenoor Panchayat, the petitioner has approach this Hon'ble Court by way of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for removable of encroachments made in the disputed property or the revenue department is the competent authority to lodged a criminal case with record to encroachments. In this regard, the then Inspector of Police Mr. R.Venugopal, wrote a letter to the Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk on 21.07.2015 asking to lodge a criminal complaint against the encroaches. Similarly the very same Inspector wrote a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Hon'ble Court on 22.07.2015 with the following details:- 1. It is now informed that both the parties were enquired, copy of documents produced by either Parties were perused and it has come to know that the Department of Revenue is the competent authority to lodge criminal case in this matter. 2. Hence, the Tahsildar, North Taluk, Madurai District is addressed through my letter dated 21.07.2015 to consider the grievance of the petitioner and to lodge criminal case before the respondent, if any prima facie is made out as averred by the petitioner. 3.
2. Hence, the Tahsildar, North Taluk, Madurai District is addressed through my letter dated 21.07.2015 to consider the grievance of the petitioner and to lodge criminal case before the respondent, if any prima facie is made out as averred by the petitioner. 3. It is submitted that the enquiry has been completed within the stipulated period and the orders of this Hon'ble High Cout is complied with. This is for favour of information.? 5. From the above, it appears that the Inspector of Police has addressed a letter dated 21.07.2015 to the Tahsildar, North Taluk, Madurai District to look into the grievance of the petitioner and if necessary, lodge a police complaint. 6. Under such circumstances, the petitioner is directed to approach the Tahsildar, North Taluk, Madurai District for appropriate action. With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.