JUDGMENT In paragraph 13 of the writ petition it has been stated that the investigation in this matter is still pending, while the delay has been explained in paragraph 17 of the writ petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. 3. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. in case crime no. 35 of 2014 under sections 420, 468, 471 and 120B I.P.C. P.S. Amroha Nagar, district Amroha. 4. From the perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused. 5. However, it is directed that in case the petitioners appear before the court concerned within 30 days from today and apply for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of by the courts below in view of the case of Smt. Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2005 Cr.L.J. 755 and Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Versus State of U.P. which has been approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in reported in 2009(4) S.C.C. 437 . 6. It is further provided that if the investigation in this matter has been completed and police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.