Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 802 (MAD)

B. Balaji Venkatesh v. Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District

2016-02-26

P.N.PRAKASH

body2016
ORDER : This petition has been filed to direct the 1st Respondent to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in civil dispute based upon the complaint dated 15.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, this petitioner has given a complaint against Andavar/5th respondent herein and similarly, on a complaint given by the said Andavar against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending before the respondent. 4. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. With the above direction, this petition is closed.