Research › Search › Judgment

Jharkhand High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 883 (JHR)

Birsa Bhengra v. State of Jharkhand

2016-05-19

PRAMATH PATNAIK

body2016
JUDGMENT : Pramath Patnaik, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are retired teacher of minority Middle School, details of the individual are being shown in the chart given below : S. No. Name of Teacher Name of School Circle Date of appointment Date of Retirement 1. Birsa Bhengra R.C. Middle School, Dorma, Khunti Torpa 1.10.1982 30.6.2013 2. Paulina Bhengra R.C. Middle School, Dorma, Khunti Torpa 18.1.1980 30.6.2013 3. Raghu Guria R.C. Middle School. Rohney, Dist Khunti Torpa 1.11.1975 30.4.2013 4. Parun Sahu Lutheran Middle School, Torpa, Dist Khunti Torpa 1.7.1982 29.2.2012 5. Lila Singh Topno Lutheran Middle School, Torpa, Dist Khunti. Torpa 24.9.1979 30.11.2007 6. Arbind Topno Lutheran Middle School, Torpa, Dist Khunti Torpa 1.9.1979 31.3.2015 7. Patras Bhengra Lutheran Middle School, Torpa, Dist Khunti Torpa 26.2.1965 31.3.2003 8. Ella Khalkho SPG Middle School, Tapkara, Dist Khunti Torpa 1.7.1982 31.3.2015 9. Mathias Kerketta R.C. Middle School, Dorma, Dist Khunti Torpa 22.4.1978 31.10.2015 10. Joshiphin Bhengra R.C. Middle School, Dorma, Dist Khunti Torpa 25.10.1975 31.12.2011 3. It is the contention of the petitioners that the schools in question are Aided Minority Schools and all expenses towards payment of salary mid retirement benefits of the school employees is funded by the State Government from the public exchequer. The petitioners are also getting pension on the basis of the pension payment order issued by the office of the Accountant General. 4. In the present writ application, the grievance of the petitioners is in relation to non-payment of leave encashment amount on the earned leave outstanding against them. They have also stated that other post retrial dues have already been paid and that salary and post retirement benefit have been paid out of grant-in-aid provided by the State Government. 5. Mr. 4. In the present writ application, the grievance of the petitioners is in relation to non-payment of leave encashment amount on the earned leave outstanding against them. They have also stated that other post retrial dues have already been paid and that salary and post retirement benefit have been paid out of grant-in-aid provided by the State Government. 5. Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though, the claim of the petitioners was resisted earlier by the respondent-State Government, but the issue has now been settled in view of the judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Mariyam Tirkey v. The State of Jharkhand and others in 2014 (2) JCR 182 (Jhr) : W.P. (S) No. 506 of 2013 and analogous cases dated 3rd January, 2014 which has also been reported in 2014 (1) JBCJ 465 and now upheld up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 15.12.2014 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20606-20607/2014. According to the petitioners, the writ petition may be disposed of in view of the judgment rendered as aforesaid by the learned Division Bench and affirmed up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court, by directing the respondents to pay the earned leave encashment amount to the petitioners. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State does not dispute that the aforesaid issue relating to admissibility of the earned leave encashment amount to the teachers of non-Government/Aided Minority School has now been decided by the judgment rendered in the case of Mariyam Tirkey (supra) and affirmed up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in such circumstances, the writ petition is being disposed of by directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, to take a decision in the matter of grant of leave encashment amount to the petitioners after due scrutiny of their relevant service records and in view of the judgment rendered in the case of Mariyam Tirkey (supra) within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with the representation on behalf of the petitioners. 8. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Petition disposed of.