JUDGMENT Om Prakash-VII,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the order dated 19.2.2016 passed by A.C.J.M., Court No. 1, Mathura in Complaint Case No. 548 of 2014 (Hari Om Sharma Vs. Rajendra Prasad and others), pending in the Court of A.C.M. Court No. 1, Mathura. Further prayer has been made to direct the Court below to decide the complaint case. 3. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that complaint is pending at the stage of passing the summoning order on 19.2.2016. Concerned Magistrate insisted to examine some of the witnesses under Section 202 Cr.P.C. Earlier an application to discharge the witnesses for examination had been moved by the applicant/complaint. It is further submitted that concerned Magistrate ought to have been passed the order on the basis of evidence available on record. No Court can compel to the complainant to examine the witnesses. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A has submitted that applicants have been summoned on the basis of the statements recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the entire record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, application is disposed of at this stage without issuing notice to the opposite party nos. 2 to 13. Direction be given to the Court concerned to dispose of the complaint case on the basis of evidence available on record itself. Order dated 19.2.2016 passed by the concerned Magistrate be deemed to be modify to this extent. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.