JUDGMENT We have heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the trial court's judgment on record. 2. This application has been filed by the appellant/applicant with the prayer that leave to appeal may be granted against the judgement and order dated 15.12.2015, passed in Sessions Trial No. 132 of 2014 (State Vs. Subhas and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 557 of 2012, under Sections 323/34, 324/34, 342/34, 294, 354, 376, 504 IPC, P.S. Azimnagar, District Rampur by the learned Sessions Judge, Rampur whereby the accused respondents have been acquitted for the offence punishable under the sections referred to above. 3. On a careful perusal of the judgment and record, it cannot be said that the view taken by the trial judge is perverse or unreasonable. Simply because another view might have been taken of the evidence provides no ground for interfering with the order of acquittal unless the view taken by the trial judge is not a possible view. The court below has given cogent, convincing and satisfactory reasons while passing the impugned judgment and order. On the evidence available on record, it cannot be said that the view taken by the trial judge was not a reasonably possible view. We, therefore, do not consider it to be a fit case for grant of leave to appeal to the applicant. The application seeking leave to appeal is, accordingly, rejected and, consequently the appeal is also dismissed.