Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 1013 (MAD)

J. Kuppusamy v. J. Chengalvaroyan

2017-04-11

T.RAVINDRAN

body2017
JUDGMENT : Plaintiff's counsel is present. 2. Defendant was already set ex-parte. 3. Thereafter, the matter was referred to the learned Master, for recording ex-parte evidence on the side of the plaintiff. 4. TOS has been filed for letters of administration in the matter of the last Will and Testament of the Deceased P.Jagannatha Naicker and J.Dhanammal. 5. In support of the plaintiff's case, PW-1 and PW-2 have been examined and Ex.P1 has been marked. The evidence of PW-1 and PW-2 and document marked as Ex.P1, remain unchallenged. 6. Considering the evidence of PW-1 and PW-2, and document marked as Ex.P1, it is found that the plaintiff has established his claim. 7. The TOS is decreed as prayed for, with costs. Letters of Administration is granted as prayed for. 8. Registry is directed to comply with the further formalities as regards the grant of letters of administration as sought for. Consequently connected the applications are closed.