JUDGMENT : Fateh Deep Singh, J. The allegations against the petitioner-Bhupinder Singh in this regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C are that accused/petitioner on 18.1.2015 committed murder of Sukhpal Singh by firing from his licenced .32 bore revolver. 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that it was a case of accidental incident and that neither any intention nor any knowledge can be attributed to the petitioner in the commission of offence and has placed reliance on CRM-M-42266 of 2013 Sham Sunder v. State of Punjab, CRM-M-6197 of 2017 Baljeet v. State of Haryana, CRM-M-36689 of 2017 Amrit Pal Singh v. State of Punjab, CRM-M-4187 of 2017 Vikrant @ Vicky and another v. State of Haryana, CRM-M- 18355 of 2015 Bhupinder v. State of Haryana and CRM-M-7482 of 2015 Harminder Singh @ Khasa v. State of Punjab. 3. Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant have sought to bring that it was a case of an eye-witness account and that the trial is underway and that the cross-examination of material witnesses is being deferred intentionally by the petitioner and that there is every likelihood that if allowed bail the petitioner would intimidate the witnesses. 4. Appreciating the submissions, there is an eye-witness account as spelled out that it was none else than the petitioner along with his co-accused non-applicant/Jaswinder Singh, who was instrumental in firing shot leading to the death of the deceased and that the first regular bail application of the petitioner has already been dismissed and no fresh ground to allow regular bail to the petitioner is made out. Dismissed.