JUDGMENT : Sureshwar Thakur, J. 1. In pursuance to an advertisement borne in Anexure P-1, the writ petitioner, applied for the post of a Clerk. However, he failed to qualify the written test. Subsequent to his failing to qualify the written test conducted by the respondent, for hence filling up the advertised vacancies, he proceeded to, through the instant petition, seek an order for quashing of the process's initiated for filling up the advertised posts. 2. Be that as it may, he has prayed that the respondent be directed to display the key answer sheets in respect of the relevant test conducted by the respondent. The initial relief aforesaid canvassed in the instant writ petition, does not warrant its being countenanced, tritely for the reason (a) given the writ petitioner apparently, not, making any ascription of any active mala-fides vis-a-vis the respondents, nor his making ascription of proactive mala-fides vis-a-vis the evaluators of the apposite answer sheet, (b) Predominantly also his not imputing any active specific mala-fides vis-a-vis the evaluators concerned, comprised in theirs proceeding to not assess the petitioner vis-a-vis his correctly ticked choices of multiple choice questions, nor obviously theirs’ awarding marks with respect to correctly ticked choices, vis-a-vis respective specific queries, thereupon the evaluators concerned mis-assessing his answer sheets. Moreover, at this belated stage, given the vacancies being filled up, also all the selected candidates receiving appointment letters, besides theirs joining the relevant posts, thereupon it would be in sagacious to hence proceed to nullify the entire exercise. 3. Moreover, the relevant Rules do not hold any prescriptions vis-a-vis the respondent being peremptorily enjoined to display the key answers in contemporanity to display of results of written tests. Even if the aforesaid Rules do not exist, may be, the canons of transparencies may yet enjoin the respondent concerned, to, make displays thereof especially in contemporanity with the display of results of written test, nonetheless, for this Court being enjoined to hold that hence there was no visible infraction vis-a-vis canons of transparencies, yet enjoined erection of the apt relevant evidentiary strata, comprised in attribution of aforesaid active specific mala-fides, vis-a-vis the evaluators. However, the aforesaid ascriptions with specific contours, are not ventilated in the writ petition, corollary whereof is that non-display of key answers significantly in contemporanity with display of results of written test, not negating validity's of the apt recruitment process's initiated by the respondent. 4. However, the aforesaid ascriptions with specific contours, are not ventilated in the writ petition, corollary whereof is that non-display of key answers significantly in contemporanity with display of results of written test, not negating validity's of the apt recruitment process's initiated by the respondent. 4. Even though, there is a solitary averment qua questions No. 16, 29 and 39, not, holding their apposite choices, for hence theirs being ticked, thereupon miskicking, if any thereof be discarded for all purposes, however, the aforesaid averment is denied, on, an affidavit furnished by the respondent concerned. Consequently, it is inferred that the aforesaid questions also held correct choices, for theirs’ being appositely ticked by all the examinees, including the petitioner. Since, thereafter the petitioner, does not, aver that despite his correctly ticking, one, amongst multiple choices thereof, his being neither evaluated nor his being awarded marks in respect thereof, thereupon the aforesaid bald averment, does not, constitute erection of the apt evidentiary strata by the petitioner, for hence this Court firmly holding that in the respondent, in, contemporanity with the display of results of written tests), not thereat displaying the key answers, thereupon for lack of transparency the recruitment process's being vitiated. 5. Consequently, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. All pending applications, if any, are disposed of. No costs.