JUDGMENT : This appeal is before us to examine correctness of the judgment dated 10.06.2010 passed by learned Family Court, No.1, Jodhpur, dismissing an application preferred under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 2. Learned Family Court while dismissing the application arrived at the conclusion that the allegations of cruelty and desertion on the part of the respondent were not well founded. 3. During the course of the adjudication of appeal, this Court decided to have conciliation between the parties and, therefore, under an order dated 21.02.2017 the parties were directed to remain personally present before the Court on next date of hearing i.e. 07.03.2017. 4. In pursuance to the order aforesaid, the parties reported to the court on 07.03.2017 and 17.04.2017 and participated with all positivity in the process of conciliation. 5. On 17.04.2017 respondent Dr. Nilima Gehlot shown willingness to accept the lump-sum maintenance in a tune of Rs.30,00,000/- in one stock as offered by the appellant Shri Kamlesh Sankhla. At the request of the parties, the matter then was adjourned for 25.04.2017. 6. Today, the parties present before the Court with their counsels submit that they have already entered into an agreement and a copy whereof is also placed on record. At the request of the parties, the matter then was adjourned for 25.04.2017. 6. Today, the parties present before the Court with their counsels submit that they have already entered into an agreement and a copy whereof is also placed on record. The contents of compromise arrived between the parties are as follows: ^^vihykFkhZ deys'k lka[kyk rFkk vizkFkhZ;k MkW0 fufyek xgyksr ds e/; fuEu izdkj jkthukek fu"ikfnr fd;k tkrk gS fd %& 1- ;g gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; fnukad 04-05-1998 dks fookg tks/kiqj 'kgj esa lEiUu gqvk Fkk ftlds i'pkr~ vkilh lgokl o jgokl ls feuy dk tUe fnukad 05-08-1999 dks gqvk tks orZeku esa vizkFkhZ;k MkW0 fufyek xgyksr ds ikl gS ftldh f'k{kk nh{kk ,oa ykyu ikyu vizkFkhZ;k gh djrh vk jgh gS rFkk nksuksa i{kdkjku fnukad 31-01-1999 ls vyx fuokl dj jgs gSA bu nksuksa ds e/; Jheku U;k;ky; ds le{k ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 13 ,p0,e0 ,DV dk izkFkZuk i= la0 169@2005 fnukad 10-06-2010 dks [kkfjt djus ds i'pkr~ vihy la0 1066@2010 deys'k lka[kyk cuke MkW0 fufyek xgyksr yfEcr gSA 2- ;g gS fd nksuksa i{kdkjksa us yksd vnkyr dh Hkkouk ls bl vk'k; dk jkthukek fd;k gS fd vihykFkhZ deys'k lka[kyk us iq=h feuy xgyksr ds ,deq'r LFkkbZ Hkj.k iks"k.k ds dqy :i;s 30]00]000@& nsuk Lohdkj fd;k gS ftlds laca/k esa vihykFkhZ }kjk dqy cSad vkWQ cM+kSnk C;koj 'kk[kk ds nks fMek.M M~kWQ~V la0 276643 :i;s 8]00]000@& fnukad 20-04-2017 rFkk 276644 :i;s 9]00]000@& fnukad 20-04-2017 rFkk ,d fMek.M M~kWQ~V Hkkjrh; LVsV cSad C;koj :i;s 7]00]000@& fnukad 18-04-2017 ,oa ,d cSadlZ pSd vkWfj;.Vy cSad vkWQ dkelZ 'kk[kk C;koj dk cSad LVsV ua0 607662 :i;s 6]00]000@& fnukad 18-04-2017 dk is'k fd;k gSA tks fMek.M M~kWQ~V fjdkMZ ij fy;k tkdj nkSjkus fMdzh vizkFkhZ;k MkW0 fufyek xgyksr dks lqiqnZ dj fn;k tkos] ftlds i'pkr~ vizkFkhZ;k Hkfo"; esa Lo;a ds fy;s rFkk iq=h feuy ds fy;s fdlh Hkh izdkj dh jkf'k dk Dyse ugha djsxh rFkk nksuksa gh i{kdkj Hkfo"; esa ,d nqljs ds fo:) fdlh Hkh izdkj dh eqdnes ckth ugha djsaxsA 3- ;g gS fd vizkFkhZ;k MkW0 fufyek xgyksr rykd nsus gsrq lger gS blfy;s nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds e/; gq;s fookg fnukad 04-05-1998 dks foPNsfnr fd;k tkdj rykd dh fMdzh tkjh dh tkrh gS rks nksuksa gh i{kdkjksa dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA^^ 7. Having considered the contents of the compromise arrived between the parties, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the instant appeal in the terms of the same. 8. The appellant handed over the original Demand Drafts details of which are given in the recorded compromise to us and we have handed over the same to the respondent present before us. 9. On payment of Demand Draft, the marriage between the parties that took place on 04.05.1998 at Jodhpur stands annulled. A decree-sheet be prepared as per the terms of compromise arrived between the parties and be granted. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of.