JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. 1. Subject matter of this appeal is the order dated 20th November, 2016, made by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby it has been held that the valuation of the suit does not fall within the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court and accordingly, the plaint was returned to the plaintiffs-appellants herein, for short “the impugned order.” 2. Plaintiffs-appellants had filed suit before this Court for recovery of Rs. 29 lacs and Rs. 5 lacs, as interest till filing of the suit. Thus, the claim of the plaintiffs has to be gathered while reading the plaint and it is the averments contained in the plaint which determines the jurisdiction of the Court. 3. While going through all paras of the plaint, one comes to an inescapable conclusion that the plaintiffs have claimed a decree for recovery of Rs. 34 lacs in toto till filing of the suit. The amount of Rs. 5 lacs is not pendente but is interest till filing of the suit, as observed by the learned Single Judge. Having said so, the amount claimed by the plaintiffs in the suit falls within the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court. 4. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. 5. Plaintiffs/appellants to deposit the deficient Court fees, within eight weeks. 6. List the suit before the learned Single Judge having the Roster. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of, alongwith pending applications, if any.