JUDGMENT : Kailash Chandra Sharma, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Ashish Sharma and Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material available on file and principles laid down in Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the judicial pronouncement (2015) 2 Supreme Court Cases 385. 2. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judicial pronouncement reported in (2015) 2 Supreme Court Cases 385, in para 5 held as under : "It is neither appropriate nor desirable that a Court simply states that maintenance should be paid from either the date of the order or the date of the application in matters of maintenance. Thus, as per Section 354(6) Cr.P.C., the Court should record reasons in support of the order passed by it, in both eventualities. The purpose of the provision is to prevent vagrancy and destitution in society and the Court must apply its mind to the options having regard to the facts of the particular case." 3. So according to the principles laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court, if the concerning Court ordered for maintenance from the date of application then the Court should record the reasons in support of this order. 4. In this case learned Judge of Family Court passed the following order : ^^vizkFkhZ f'kojke eh.kk dks vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd og Hk.kiks"k.k dh mDr jkf'k dk Hkqxrku izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus dh fnukad 2-5-2011 ls izkFkhZ la[;k 2 o 3 ds o;Ld gksus dh fnukad rd mDr vo;Ld izkFkhZx.k la[;k 2 o 3 dks tfj;s oyh ekrk bejrh nsoh djsA** 5. Thus it is clear from the perusal of impugned judgment dated 28.9.2016 that no specific reasons or grounds have been mentioned in the judgment in respect of payment of maintenance from the date of application presented before that Court. 6. In my opinion, compliance of principles laid down of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above mentioned judicial pronouncement is not in the impugned judgment. 7. Hence this matter may be remanded back to the concerned Court i.e. learned Family Court, Dausa after quashing the impugned order upto close date of payment only. 8. Learned Family Court, Dausa is directed to pass a fresh order of payment of maintenance allowance after hearing both the parties and perused the available material according to law. Both the parties is directed that they will remain present before Family Court, Dausa on 20.6.2017. 8. Learned Family Court, Dausa is directed to pass a fresh order of payment of maintenance allowance after hearing both the parties and perused the available material according to law. Both the parties is directed that they will remain present before Family Court, Dausa on 20.6.2017. This revision petition is disposed of, accordingly.