ORDER : Abhilasha Kumari, J. This Habeas' Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred by the petitioner with of prayer to direct the respondents to produce Aartiben, her daughter, who has allegedly been illegally detained by respondent No. 3. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the corpus was in a relationship with respondent No. 3 for the past two to three months. On 03.07.2017, respondent No. 3 has illegally abducted the corpus. Respondents Nos. 4 to 6, the two brothers and the mother of respondent No. 3, have allegedly approached the petitioner and threatened and pressurized her not to file a complaint against them. They assured the petitioner that her daughter is alive and safe and no harm would occur to her. Thereafter, respondent No. 3 demanded certain documents to enable him to perform the marriage ceremony with the corpus. However, according to the petitioner, the said respondent threatened the petitioner not to disclose this fact. 3. It is further stated in the petition that the Janvajog entry made by the Police Inspector, Shaherkotda Police Station, on 05.07.2017, has been considerably watered down and does not reflect the genuine narration of the case as given by the petitioner. The petitioner has filed a further affidavit pursuant to the order dated 03.08.2017, passed by this Court, wherein certain allegations are made against Shri Arkhabhai Karshanbhai Solanki, Unarmed Head Constable, who according to the petitioner, has acted in a partisan manner. The said affidavit is taken on record. 4. Be that as it may, insofar as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, the corpus has been produced before the Court, today. 5. Heard Mr. Divyang A. Ramani, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Ronak Raval, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Kamlesh Kotai, learned advocate for respondents nos. 3 to 6. 6. We have interacted with the corpus, Aartiben, in Chambers. She has informed us that she has got married to respondent No. 3 on 06.08.2017 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the Marriage Certificate dated 06.08.2017, issued by Arya Samaj Mandir in Akhil Bhartiya Arya Samaj Trust, 90 Bank Colony, Annapurna Road, Madha Pradesh, wherein it is stated that respondent No. 3 and the corpus have got married on 06.08.2017, as per Hindu rites and rituals. 7. 7. A report dated 09.08.2017 of Shri Arkhabhai Karshanbhai Solanki, Unarmed Head Constable, Shaherkotda Police Station, has also been produced by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor along with documents such as the Marriage Certificate and statements of the corpus and respondent No. 3. 8. A perusal of the statement of the corpus dated 09.08.2017 indicates that she was not abducted by respondent No. 3. 9. Before us as well, the corpus has stated that she has got married to respondent No. 3 of her own free will. As both of them are now married, she wants to stay with respondent No. 3. She has stated that she was not illegally detained at any point of time by respondent No. 3 or the other private respondents. 10. We have also interacted with respondent No. 3, who has shown us certain photographs of the marriage ceremony performed between him and the corpus. He has stated that his parents have accepted the corpus and they would all treat her well. 11. Taking into consideration the desire of the corpus, who is an adult aged twenty years, to go with respondent No. 3 and as no element of abduction or illegal detention is found in the matter, nothing further remains for adjudication in the petition. 12. The corpus is at liberty to go with respondent No. 3, if she so desires. 13. The petition is, therefore, disposed of. Rule is discharged.