Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 1545 (ALL)

Mukesh Chandra v. State of U. P.

2017-06-19

MANOJ MISRA

body2017
JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in case crime No. 225 of 2015, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Makkhanpur District Firozabad with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an adopted son of deceased Khajan Singh and on the basis of right obtained under adoption, the applicant executed sale deed. It has been submitted that no false document within the meaning of Section 464 I.P.C. has been prepared. The dispute has been raised by nephew of Khajan Singh who died issue less. It has been submitted that the dispute is purely of a civil nature and with a mala fide intention it has been given colour of a criminal case. It has been submitted that the applicant is innocent with no previous criminal history; he is in jail since 20.12.2016 and, in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant, but could not point out anything material to the contrary. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made, without commenting upon merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Let applicant Mukesh Chandra be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following additional conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice: - (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses. (ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.