Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 1708 (MAD)

Ashok Transport represented by its Proprietor S. Palanivelu, Madurai v. Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation

2017-06-13

K.KALYANASUNDARAM

body2017
ORDER : This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide Na.Ka.Bi.1/1827/2015, dated 26.5.2017 and quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the transport contract as per the terms and condition of the agreement dated 26.5.2016 for other than Food Corporation of India Movement, Madurai Region. 2. Mr. Mayarajan, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself. 4. The order impugned in this Writ Petition is mainly attacked on the ground that without issuing notice and without conducting enquiry, the respondents have passed the impugned order and hence, it is in violation of principles of natural justice. 5. Mr.Mayarajan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents/Corporation would submit that in similar circumstances, this Court in W.P(MD)No.7224 an d 7225 of 2017, dated 25.5.2017, has quashed the impugned order and remitted the case to the respondents therein to pass a fresh order. The learned Standing Counsel has also produced a copy of the said order. 6. In view of the above submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, the order impugned in this Writ Petition is quashed and the matter is remitted back to the second respondent to pass orders afresh, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the Petitioner and other interested parties, if any, as expeditiously as possible. 7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.