Ajit Singh, J. 1. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 5.5.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge of this High Court, whereby he has allowed Respondent’s WP(C) No.908/2004. 2. On 17.6.2001, Priya Nath Das-husband of respondent, aged about 51 years, died of electrocution. The respondent-wife filed WP(C) No.908/2004 against the appellant for payment of compensation. The learned Single Judge, by the impugned order, after making necessary calculation, has held that respondent is entitled for Rs.3,72,000/- with interest @ 6% from the date of filing of petition i.e. 11.2.2004. Aggrieved with the impugned order, the appellant has filed the present appeal. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order. In the fact situation of the case, the amount of compensation determined by the learned Single Judge is just and proper. The record also reveals that vide order dated 31.1.2015 this appeal was admitted subject to appellant depositing Rs.3,72,000/- with the Registry and the amount after being deposited has been duly released in favour of respondent, vide order dated 21.4.2015. It is also to be noted that today in an identical WA No.54/2015 the appellant has agreed to pay the amount of compensation determined by the learned Single Judge. The appellant must now deposit the interest on the amount of Rs.3,72,000/- as directed by the learned Single Judge within 45 days from today. 4. We find no merit in the appeal. It is accordingly dismissed.