JUDGMENT : 1. By way of this instant application, the petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to direct the respondent no.3 to re-fix their pay on 01.01.1996 in revised pay scale which was introduced by the State Government, vide resolution no.2315 dated 30.08.2007 after adding amount of interim relief and teaching allowance. FACTUAL MATRIX 2. The petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 were appointed as Assistant Teachers in the year 1983, 1985, 1987 and 1972 respectively, whereas, Petitioner No.5 was appointed as a clerk in the year 1985 in St. John High School, Nawatanr. Vide Resolution No. 179 dated 22.12.1981, the State of Bihar (now Jharkhand), Department of Education decided to maintain complete parity between the two sets of teachers i.e. Government Nationalized High School and Government Recognized Aided Minority High School in the matter of extending pay scales and also payment of other allowances. The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) issued a resolution bearing letter No.6022 dated 18.12.1989 whereby the Headmaster of Middle School and the Teachers of High School and the Headmaster of +2 school were made entitled for payment of teaching allowance @ Rs.100/- per month whereas Headmasters of High School and +2 School shall be entitled for payment of teaching allowance @ Rs.150/- per month from 01.03.1989. The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand), Department of Education vide Resolution No.237 dated 20.02.1990, which was issued in the name of Governor of Bihar has decided to extend all facilities to the teaching and non-teaching staff of Government Recognized Aided Minority Schools at par with the Government Nationalized Schools and further decided to provide all facilities, which are applicable to other the Government employee. Thereafter, in the year 1995 the State of Bihar (now Jharkhand), the Department of Finance vide Resolution No.4294 dated 25.08.1995 decided to grant interim relief @ Rs.100/- per month w.e.f. 01.04.1994 to its employees. Thereafter, vide resolution No.4382 dated 02.08.1997 the State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) Department of Finance decided to grant interim relief to its employees @ 10% of basic pay w.e.f. 01.04.1997. Thereafter, vide resolution No.4382 dated 02.08.1997 the State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) Department of Finance decided to grant interim relief to its employees @ 10% of basic pay w.e.f. 01.04.1997. After bifurcation of the State, the Government of Jharkhand has also adopted resolution i.e. Resolution No.179 dated 22.12.1981 and resolution No. 237 dated 20.02.1990 and on that basis all facilities, which were available to the teaching and non-teaching staff of Government Nationalized Schools were also extended to the teaching and non-teaching staff of Government Minority Aided Schools including the petitioners' school. Vide resolution No. 5043 dated 07.08.1998 the State of Bihar decided to grant interim relief w.e.f. 01.04.1998 at the rate of 10% of basic minimum Rs.100/- per month, in the light of agreement made between the State Government and Association of Government Employee cum Teaching and Non-teaching Staffs of Nationalized Institutions/Schools. In light of the said decision of the State Government, the interim relief and teaching allowance were also paid to them by the State respondents, up to 1999. Vide resolution No.660 dated 08.02.1999 the State of Jharkhand, Department of Finance revised the pay scale of Government employees w.e.f. 01.01.1996 including staff of Nationalized Schools. Thereafter respondent No.1 vide resolution No.2315 dated 20.08.2007 accepted and adopted the Government's resolution dated 08.02.1999 and also revised the pay scale of teaching and non-teaching staffs of Government Recognized Minority Aided Schools w.e.f. 01.01.1996. Thereafter, vide letter No.2728 dated 26.09.2007 respondent No.1 issued an instruction/guideline regarding fixation of pay in revised pay scale and it has also been directed that District Level pay fixation will be done by the respective District Education Officers and District Account Officers. The State of Jharkhand, Department of Human Resources Development, vide resolution No.2863 dated 01.12.2008 after adopting the earlier Government Resolution No.237 dated 20.02.1990 of erstwhile State of Bihar has also decided to add 50% D.A in the basic pay for the purpose of making payment of D.A., House Rent, Medical Allowance etc. and the age of retirement of staff of Minority Schools has also been enhanced from 58 years to 60 years and they have also been given the benefits of scheme of ACP w.e.f. 09.08.1999. and the age of retirement of staff of Minority Schools has also been enhanced from 58 years to 60 years and they have also been given the benefits of scheme of ACP w.e.f. 09.08.1999. The respondent No.3 contrary to the Government's decision, fixed the petitioners' pay in revised pay scale w.e.f. 01.01.1996 without adding the amount of teaching allowance and amount of interim relief and soon after the knowledge of the same, the petitioner have approached the respondent No.3 for re-fixation of their pay after adding the amount of teaching allowance and interim relief in the light of Govt. decision but the respondent No.3 has not considered the matter and hence, the instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners. 3. Mr. M.M.Pan, learned Counsel for the petitioners strenuously urges that the respondent-State has illegally and arbitrarily denied the benefits of the pay scales to the petitioners who are legally entitled for the same. The issue raised in the instant writ petition is no more res-integra as it has already been taken into consideration by the Hon'ble Patna High Court in C.W.J.C.No.2897/2005. Relying on the said order of the Patna High Court, learned Counsel submits that letter No.2728 dated 26.09.2007 was issued by the Government which relates to instructions/guidelines with respect to the fixation of pay in revised pay scale wherein it has specifically been mentioned that the pay is to be fixed after adding teaching allowance and interim relief. 4. Learned Counsel further submits that the concerned authority has already been represented by the petitioners and in fact, the same issue has already been decided in W.P.(S)No.5419/2014 and W.P.(S). No. 4284 of 2016. 5. Per contra, learned Counsel for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioners. 6. Learned Counsel for the State submits that though no order has been passed against the petitioners, they have rushed to the Court without waiting for the order and as such this writ petition is premature but in any view of the matter, the respondent-State is bound to consider the order and direction and the issue decided in C.W.J.C.No.2897/2005 and that of W.P.(S)No.5419/2014 and W.P.(S). No. 4284 of 2016. 7. No. 4284 of 2016. 7. Be that as it may, having gone through the rival submissions of the parties, in my view the petitioners are entitled for the benefits as prayed for in the instant writ application i.e. for re-fixation of their salary in the revised pay scale w.e.f. 01.01.1996 after quantifying the amount of interim relief and teaching allowance in view of letter No. 2728 dated 26.09.2007. The Hon'ble Patna High Court in C.W.J.C.No.2897/2005 clearly observed: “ I, therefore, hold and direct that as per the decision of the Government itself to maintain complete parity in matters of paying pay scales and payments as between Teachers in Government Nationalized Schools and Teachers of Government aided minority institutions, anything that is paid to the Teachers of Nationalized Government Schools, would be payable to the Government aided recognized minority institution as well otherwise there would be chance of violtion of Article 30(2) of the Constitution.” 8. It is an admitted fact that the Government has not come out with a policy to discriminate between teachers of nationalized Government Schools and Teachers of Government aided minority schools in matters of payment where payment is to be made from Government aid. In that view of the matter, when a teacher in a Govt. nationalized school or a Teacher in a Government aided minority educational institution having same eligibility/ criteria and the same qualification they have to be treated similarly Article 30(2) of the Constitution prohibits such discrimination and thus discrimination would be violation of the aforesaid provision of the Constitution as there is no decision on record where parity has been broken or Govt. has decided to forget this parity. Thus if teachers of Govt. aided recognized minority institutions were to be deprived of the interim relief, that had to be specifically mentioned, otherwise automatically it would be carried to all Teachers as well. 9. As a cumulative effect of the aforesaid observations, rules, guidelines and Govt. circulars, this Court is of the considered view that petitioners are entitled for re-fixation of their salary in the revised pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.1996 after quantifying the amount of interim relief and teaching allowance in view of letter No. 2728 dated 26.09.2007. Resultantly, the writ petition stands allowed. As a cumulative effect of the aforesaid observations, rules, guidelines and Govt. circulars, this Court is of the considered view that petitioners are entitled for re-fixation of their salary in the revised pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.1996 after quantifying the amount of interim relief and teaching allowance in view of letter No. 2728 dated 26.09.2007. Resultantly, the writ petition stands allowed. The respondents are directed to make the entire payments with all consequential benefits to the petitioners within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order.