Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 1956 (RAJ)

Mahendra Kumar Baheti v. State of Rajasthan

2017-09-01

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

body2017
ORDER : Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. The petitioners have preferred this misc. petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., 1973 for quashing the registration and investigation in the matter of FIR No. 45/2016, lodged at Police Station Sukher, District Udaipur, for the offence under Section 4/5 of explosive substance act and 5/9-B of explosive act. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners want to submit a representation along with all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioners submit a representation along with all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation. 4. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the petitioners submit a representation along with all the necessary documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor. However, if during the investigation, the concerned investigating authority needs to arrest the petitioners, then the petitioners shall be given seven days notice before making such arrest.