JUDGMENT : Banwari Lal Sharma, J. 1- vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh us ;g vihy fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k eksVj nq?kZVuk okn U;k;kf/kdj.k] dksViqryh] t;iqj ftyk }kjk Ádj.k la[;k ,eŒ,ŒlhŒ 112@2005] dkS'kY;k o vU; cuke ?kUlhjke o vU; esa ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ;@iapkV fnukad 28-11-2006 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gSA 2- Ádj.k ds laf{kIr rF; bl Ádkj gS fd ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 1 yxk;r 6 DysesaV~l us fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds le{k /kkjk 163, eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kfu;e ds Áko/kkuksa ds rgr ,d Dyse ;kfpdk bl vk'k; dh is'k dh gS%& ^^fnukad 20-10-2004 dks e`rd v'kksd xqtZj ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 7] 8 rFkk 9 Øe'k% ?kUlhjke] nkrkjke rFkk LVsV cSad vkWQ ifV;kyk] 'kk[kk dksViqryh ds funsZ'ku esa xkso/kZujke pkSdh [ksrh dh tqrkbZ ds ckn jkf= 8&9 cts ikFkjsMh tk jgk FkkA jktukSrk jksM+ ij lhesaV QSDVªh ds ikl VsªDVj iyV x;k] uhps ncus ls mldh e`R;q gks xbZA oDr nq?kZVuk e`rd v'kksd 25 lky dk g`"V iq"V o LoLFk O;fDr Fkk VªsDVj Mªkbojh ls 6]000 :i;s Áfrekg o [ksrh ls 5]000 :i;s Áfrekg o Bsdnkjksa dh ctjh lIykbZ djds 4&5 gtkj :i;s Áfrekg] lHkh lzksrksa ls 15]000 :i;s Áfrekg dekrk FkkA** 3- bl Ádkj dqy {kfriwfrZ 46]40]000 :i;s dh jkf'k pkgh x;h gSA rRi'pkr~ fnukad 27 Qjojh 2006 dks ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l dh vksj ls ,d vkosnu bl vk'k; dk is'k fd;k x;k fd ÁkFkhZ;k us vius ifr dh vk; 15]000@& :i;s ekfld crk;k gS rFkk blh vk/kkj ij Dyse fd;k x;k gSA ftlesa ÁkfFkZ;k us fuosnu fd;k gS fd vius Dyse ÁkFkZuk i= esa okf"kZd vk; 40]000@& :i;s j[kuk pkgrh gS rFkk ckdh vk; NksM+rh gSA vr% mlds ifr dh vk; 40]000@ :i;s rd gh ekus tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tkosA 4- mDr Dyse ;kfpdk ntZ dh tkdj ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 7] 8 o 9 dks v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk uksfVl tkjh fd;s x;sA ftl ij ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 7 rFkk 8 dh vksj ls dksbZ tokc is'k ugha fd;k x;k rFkk ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 9 us viuk tokc is'k fd;kA ftlesa cSad us Dyse ÁkFkZuk i= esa of.kZr rF;ksa dks vLohdkj djrs gq, crk;k gS fd vÁkFkhZ la[;k 1 o 2 us okgu VªsDVj uEcj vkjŒtsŒ 32&vkj&0483 dks [kjhnus ds fy, muls _.k fy;k FkkA vr% mudk laca/k _.knkrk rFkk _.kh dk gS rFkk cSad dks ;g vf/kdkj gS fd vÁkFkhZ la[;k 1 o 2 }kjk _.k dh vnk;xh ugha fd;s tkus ij vÁkFkhZ la[;k 3 cSad mDr okgu dks vius dCts esa dj cspku] uhyke dj ldrk gSA bl Ádkj cSad {kfriwfrZ ds fy, mRrjnk;h ugha gSA 5- vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh us vius tcko esa DysesaV~l }kjk rF;ksa dks vLohdkj djrs gq, dFku fd;k gS fd chek ikWfylh esa ek= osru ij fu;ksftr MªkbZoj gsrq gh fjLd doj dh tkrh gSA blds vykok vU; Ádkj ds pkyd gsrq dksbZ fjLd doj ugha gksrh gSA ÁLrqr Ádj.k esa dfFkr e`rd okgu Lokeh dk iq= gksuk vafdr djrs gq, ÁkFkZuk i= ÁLrqr fd;k gSA vr% ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa mRrjnkrk dk ÁLrqr Dyse ;kfpdk gsrq dkuwuu dksbZ nkf;Ro vk;n ugha gksrk gSA vr% Dyse ;kfpdk DysesaV ljljh rkSj ij [kkfjt fd;k tkosA ,d vkifRr ;g Hkh yh gS fd DysesaV~l us e`rd dh ekfld vk; 15]000@& :i;s yh gSA bl dkj.k /kkjk 163, ,eoh ,DV ds rgr ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gSA 6- mDr vfHkopuksa ds vk/kkj ij fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fuEu fook|d dk;e fd;s x;s%& ¼1½ D;k v'kksd dh e`R;q VªsDVj la[;k vkjŒtsŒ 32 vkj&0483 dks jktukSrk jksM+ ij fnukad 20-10-2004 dks jkf= ds 9 cts vÁkFkhZ l= 1 o 2 ds fu;kstu funsZ'ku esa pyus ds nkSjku VªsDVj iyV tkus ls gqbZ gS] bl dkj.k /kkjk 163, eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e esa ;kfpdk vuqlkj ÁkFkhZx.k lHkh vÁkFkhZx.k ls {kfriwfrZ ÁkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gS \ ÁkFkhZ ¼2½ D;k vÁkFkhZ la[;k 4 chek dEiuh }kjk mlds tokc esa mBkbZ xbZ vkifRr;ka lkFkZd gS \ ;fn gka rks mldk ;kfpdk ij vlj D;k gS \ ÁkFkhZ ¼3½ vuqrks"k \ 7- rRi'pkr~ fook|d la[;k 1 dk fu.kZ; ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l ds i{k esa djrs gq, 3]58]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k crkSj {kfriwfrZ DysesaV~l dks ÁkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ekuk gS rFkk fook|d la[;k 2 dk fu.kZ; vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh ds fo:} fd;k x;k gSA ftlls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh us ;g vihy bl U;k;ky; ds le{k ÁLrqr dh gSA 8- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us fuosnu fd;k gS fd ;kfpdk esa ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l us e`rd dh vk; 15]000@& :i;s ekfld crk;h gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa /kkjk 163, ,eoh ,DV ds Áko/kkuksa ds rgr ;g ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gS] D;ksafd eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 163, ds 'ksM~;wy f}rh; esa tks vf/kdre vk; crk;h x;h gS] og 40]000 :i;s rd gh crk;h x;h gSA 9- vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us vius rdksZ ds leFkZu esa nhid fxjh'kHkkbZ lksuh o vU; cuke ;wukbZVsM bafM;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] cMkSnk] ¼2004½ 5 ,lŒlhŒlhŒ 385 dk voyEcu fy;k gSA 10- bl rdZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/koDrk ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l us fuosnu fd;k gS fd bl Ádj.k esa fnukad 27-2-2006 dks ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l us ,d vkosnu is'k dj e`rd dh vk; 40]000@& :i;s okf"kZd rd lhfer j[krs gq, Dyse ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;s tkus gsrq fuosnu fd;kA ftls fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k us Lohdkj djrs gq, e`rd dh vk; lk{; ds vk/kkj ij flQZ 2500@& :i;s Áfrekg ekuk gS tks fd okf"kZd 30]000@& :i;s vkrk gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd bl vk/kkj ij Dyse ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gksA 11- bl rdZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA 12- nhid fxjh'kHkkbZ lksuh o vU; cuke ;wukbZVsM bafM;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] cMkSnk ¼mijksDr½ ds Ádj.k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "In our opinion, the proceeding under Section 163A being a social security provision, providing for a district scheme, only those whose annual income is upto Rs. 40,000/- can take the benefit thereof. 40,000/- can take the benefit thereof. All other claims are required to be determined in terms of Chapter XII of the Act." 13- rn~uqlkj 173, ,eoh ,DV ds Áko/kkuksa ds rgr ihfMr@e`rd ftldh okf"kZd vk; 40]000@& :i;s rd gks] ds }kjk gh is'k fd;k tk ldrk gS ftlesa dksbZ fookn ugha gSA ijUrq gLrxr Ádj.k esa ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l dh vksj ls ÁLrqr vkosnu fnukad 27-2-2006 ds }kjk e`rd dh vk; 40]000@& :i;s rd ekus tkus ds laca/k esa fuosnu fd;k gS vkSj ml vkosnu ij fopkj dj v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k us i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ls e`rd dh vk; flQZ 2500@& :i;s Áfrekg vFkkZr~ 30]000@& :i;s okf"kZd ekurs gq, fu.khZr fd;k gSA vr% bl laca/k esa vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls dh x;h vkifRr esa dksbZ lkj ugha ik;k tkrk gSA 14- vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls nwljh vkifRr ;g dh x;h gS fd bl Ádj.k esa fyIr VªsDVj uEcj vkjŒtsŒ 32 vkjŒ 0483 ds iathd`r Lokeh ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 7 ?kUlhjke iq= cgknqj rFkk ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 8 nkrkjke iq= cgknqj rFkk e`rd Lo;a tks fd nkrkjke dk iq= gS] vius firk ls VªsDVj ekaxdj ys x;k FkkA vr% /kkjk 163, eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk vf/kfu;e ds rgr ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l }kjk ÁLrqr ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gSA mUgksaus fuosnu fd;k gS fd /kkjk 163, ds Áko/kku /kkjk 166 ,eoh ,DV dk oSdfYid gS rFkk dksbZ O;fDr viuh gh xyrh ds fy, {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ÁkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA ;g vid`R; fof/k dk lkekU; fl}kUr gSA 15- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vksfj;UVy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke ehek okfj;ky o vU;] 2007 ¼5½ ,lŒlhŒlhŒ 428 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok esa pkyd vko';d i{kdkj ugha gS vkSj pkyd--------- dh xyrh ds fy, {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ÁkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA 16- blh Ádkj fuaxEek o vU; cuke ;wukbZVsM bafM;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] 2009 ,ŒlhŒtsŒ 2020 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk voyEcu fy;k gSA mUgksaus fuosnu fd;k gS fd ;fn dksbZ okgu Lokeh] dksbZ okgu vius Á;ksx esa ysrs gq, nq?kZVukxzLr gks tkrk gS rks mlds fof/kd Áfrfuf/kx.k {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ÁkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSA 17- mDr rdksZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, vf/koDrk ÁR;FkhZ us fuosnu fd;k gS fd /kkjk 163, eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e] 1988 fof'k"V Áko/kku gS tks /kkjk 166] 140 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e o vU; Áko/kkuksa ls fHkUu gS rFkk muls vÁHkkfor gSA mUgksaus nhid fxjh'kHkkbZ lksuh o vU; cuke ;wukbZVsM bafM;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] cMkSnk] ¼2004½ 5 ,lŒlhŒlhŒ 385 dk voyEcu fy;k gSA 18- lquk x;k] mHk; i{k ds rdksZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA 19- tgka rd vksfj;UVy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke ehuk okfj;ky o vU; ¼mijksDr½ dk Á'u gS] bl U;kf;d n`"VkUr ds iSjk la[;k 9 esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "Before we proceed to consider the main aspect arising for decision in this Appeal, we would like to make certain general observations. It may be true that the Motor Vehicles Act, insofar as it relates to claims for compensation arising out of accidents, is a beneficent piece of legislation. It may also be true that subject to the rules made in that behalf, the Tribunal may follow a summary procedure in dealing with a claim. That does not mean that a Tribunal approached with a claim for compensation under the Act should ignore all basic principles of law in determining the claim for compensation. Ordinarily, a contract of insurance is a contract of indemnity. When a car belonging to an owner is insured with the insurance company and it is being driven by a driver employed by the insured, when it meets with an accident, the primary liability under law for payment of compensation is that of the driver. Once the driver is liable, the owner of the vehicle becomes vicariously liable for payment of compensation. It is this vicarious liability of the owner that is indemnified by the insurance company. A third party for whose benefit the insurance is taken, is therefore entitled to show, when he moves under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, that the driver was negligent in driving the vehicle resulting in the accident; that the owner was vicariously liable and that the insurance company was bound to indemnify the owner and consequently, satisfy the award made. Therefore, under general principles, one would expect the driver to be impleaded before an adjudication is claimed under Section 166 of the Act as to whether a claimant before the Tribunal is entitled to compensation for an accident that has occurred due to alleged negligence of the driver. Why should not a Tribunal insist on the driver of the vehicle being impleaded when a claim is being filed? As we have noticed, the relevant provisions of the Act are not intended to jettison all principles of law relating to a claim for compensation which is still based on tortious liability. The Tribunal ought to have, in the case, on hand, directed the claimant to implead Mahmood Hasan who was allegedly driving the vehicle at the time of the accident. Here, there was also controversy whether it was Mahmood Hasan who was driving the vehicle or it was the deceased himself. The Tribunal ought to have, in the case, on hand, directed the claimant to implead Mahmood Hasan who was allegedly driving the vehicle at the time of the accident. Here, there was also controversy whether it was Mahmood Hasan who was driving the vehicle or it was the deceased himself. Surely, such a question could have been decided only in the presence of Mahmood Hasan who would have been principally liable for any compensation that might be decreed in case he was driving the vehicle. Secondly, the deceased was employed in a limited company. It was necessary for the claimants to establish what was the monthly income and what was the dependency on the basis of which the compensation could be adjudged as payable. Should not any Tribunal trained in law ask the claimants to produce evidence in support of the monthly salary or income earned by the deceased from his employer Company? Is there anything in the Motor Vehicles Act which stands in the may of the Tribunal asking for the best evidence, acceptable evidence? We think not. Here again, the position that the Motor Vehicles Act vis-a-vis claim for compensation arising out of an accident is a beneficent piece of legislation, cannot lead a Tribunal trained in law to forget all basic principles of establishing liability and establishing the quantum of compensation payable. The Tribunal, in this case, has chosen to merely go by the oral evidence of the widow when without any difficulty the claimants could have got the employer company to produce the relevant documents to show the income that was being derived by the deceased from his employment. Of course, in this case, the above two aspects become relevant only if we find the insurance company liable. Of course, in this case, the above two aspects become relevant only if we find the insurance company liable. If we find that only the owner of the vehicle, the employer of the deceased was liable, there will be no occasion to further consider these aspects since the owner has acquiesced in the award passed by the Tribunal against it." 20- bl U;kf;d n`"VkUr ds Ádj.k /kkjk 166 ,eoh ,DV ls lacaf/kr Fkk] blesa /kkjk 163, ,eoh ,DV tks fd fof'k"V Áko/kku gS] ds laca/k esa dksbZ fu"d"kZ ugha gSA rn~uqlkj bl Ádj.k esa fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls ÁLrqr rdksZ ds laca/k esa ;g U;kf;d n`"VkUr vihykFkhZ dks dksbZ enn ugha djrk gS] cfYd blh U;kf;d n`"VkUr ds iSjk la[;k 24 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS %& "We think that the law laid down in Minu B. Mehta and Another vs. Balkrishna Ramchandra Nayan and Another (supra) was accepted by the legislature while enacting the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by introducing Section 163A of the Act providing for payment of compensation notwithstanding anything contained in the Act or in any other law for the time being in force that the owner of a motor vehicle or the authorised insurer shall be liable to pay in the case of death or permanent disablement due to accident arising out of the use of the motor vehicle, compensation, as indicated in the Second Schedule, to the legal heirs or the victim, as the case may be, and in a claim made under sub-section (1) of Section 163A of the Act, the claimant shall not be required to plead or establish that the death or permanent disablement in respect of which the claim has been made was due to any wrongful act or neglect or default of the owner of the vehicle concerned. Therefore, the victim of an accident or his dependents have an option either to proceed under Section 166 of the Act or under Section 166 of the Act or under Section 163A of the Act. Once they approach the Tribunal under Section 166 of the Act, they have necessarily to take upon themselves the burden of establishing the negligence of the driver or owner of the vehicle concerned. Once they approach the Tribunal under Section 166 of the Act, they have necessarily to take upon themselves the burden of establishing the negligence of the driver or owner of the vehicle concerned. But if they proceed under Section 163A of the Act, the compensation will be awarded in terms of the Schedule without calling upon the victim or his dependents to establish any negligence or default on the part of the owner of the vehicle or the driver of the driver of the vehicle." 21- ftlls Li"V gS fd /kkjk 163, eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e ds Áko/kku /kkjk 166 eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e ds Áko/kkuksa ls fHkUu gS vkSj blesa u rks pkyd vko';d i{kdkj gS vkSj uk gh fdlh Ádkj dh mis{kk o ykijokgh DysesaV@DysesaV~l dks lkfcr djus dh vko';drk gSA 22- nhid fxjh'kHkkbZ lksuh o vU; cuke ;wukbZVsM bafM;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] cMkSnk ¼mijksDr½ ds Ádj.k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us iSjk la[;k 66 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "We may notice that Section 167 of the Act provides that where death of, or bodily injury to, any person gives rise to claim of compensation under the Act and also under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, he cannot claim compensation under both the Acts. The Motor Vehicles Act contains different expressions as, for example, under the provision of the Act, provisions of this Act, under any other provisions of this Act or any other law or otherwise. In Section 163-A, the expression notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in any other law for the time being in force has been used, which goes to show that the Parliament intended to insert a non-obstante clause of wide nature which would mean that the provisions of Section 163-A would apply despite the contrary provisions existing in the said Act or any other law for the time being in force. Section 163-A of the Act covers cases where even negligence is on the part of the victim. Section 163-A of the Act covers cases where even negligence is on the part of the victim. It is by way of an exception to Section 166 and the concept of social justice has been duly taken care of." 23- ftlls Li"V gS fd /kkjk 163, ,eoh ,DV ds Áko/kku eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e dh vU; /kkjk 166 o 140 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds Áko/kkuksa ls ÁHkkfor ugha gSA 24- fuaxEek o vU; cuke ;wukbZVsM bafM;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM ¼mijksDr½ ds Ádj.k esa e`rd us eksVj lkbZfdy ds iathd`r Lokeh us eksVj lkbZfdy m/kkj yh vkSj nq?kZVukxzLr gks x;h rFkk nq?kZVuk esa mldh e`R;q gks x;hA ftl ij ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd ,sls ekeyksa esa tgka ij okgu Lokeh ls okgu m/kkj ysdj Á;ksx esa fy;s tkrs le; okgu nq?kZVukxzLr gks tkrk gS rks og okgu Lokeh ds LFkku ij ekus tkus ;ksX; gS vkSj bl dkj.k DysesaV~l dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ÁkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha ekukA 25- ijUrq gLrxr Ádj.k esa tks lk{; vk;h gS] mlds vuqlkj ;kfpdk esa Lo;a ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l us vfHkopu fd;s gSa fd e`rd ÁR;FkhZ la[;k 7 o 8 ¼vÁkFkhZ la[;k 1 o 2½ ds fu;kstu esa gksrs gq, MªkbZojh ds in ij dk;Z dj jgk FkkA tks lk{; vk;h gS mlesa Hkh xokg ,ŒMŒ 1 dkS'kY;k nsoh tks fd e`rd dh iRuh gS] us vius eq[; ijh{k.k gsrq ÁLrqr 'kiFk i= esa Li"V dFku fd;k gS fd mldk ifr VªsDVj vkjŒtsŒ 32 vkjŒ 0483 ij MªkbZojh dk dke djrk Fkk rFkk MªkbZojh dk dke djrs gq, fnukad 20-10-2004 dks VªsDVj ysdj vk jgk Fkk fd jkLrs esa jktukSrk jksM+ ij lhesUV QSDVªh ds ikl igaqpk vkSj VªsDVj iyV x;kA mldk ifr VªsDVj ds uhps nc x;k] ftlls mldh ekSds ij gh e`R;q gks x;hA bl lk{kh ls Áfrijh{k.k fd;s tkus ij bl lk{kh us bl dFku dks xyr crk;k gS fd os lHkh lhj jgrs gksaA ftlls Li"V gS fd e`rd vius firk ls vyx jgrk FkkA vr% fuaxEek o vU; cuke ;wukbZVsM bafM;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM ¼mijksDr½ ds Ádj.k esa tks rF; vk;s gS] os rF; gLrxr Ádj.k esa ykxw ugha gksrs] cfYd VªsDVj Lokeh ds fu;kstu esa gksuk ÁdV gksrk gSA ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l dh vksj ls ÁLrqr fu;kstu ds laca/k esa tks lk{; vk;h gS] mlds [k.Mu esa vihykFkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh x;h gSA blfy, ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l dh vksj ls ÁLrqr lk{; dks ugha ekus tkus dk dksbZ dkj.k ugha gSA 26- rn~uqlkj chek dEiuh dh vksj ls ÁLrqr vkifRr Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha ik;h tkrh gSA 27- bl Ádkj bl vihy esa dksbZ lkj ugha ik;k tkrk gS ,oa fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k us ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l dh /kkjk 163, eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e ds rgr ÁLrqr ;kfpdk dks Lohdkj djrs gq, 3]58]000@& :i;s dk vokMZ ikfjr dj ;kfpdk ÁLrqr djus dh frfFk ls iw.kZ olwyh rd 6 Áfr'kr okf"kZd nj ls C;kt fnyk;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dksbZ vk/kkj ugha ik;k tkrk gSA 28- rn~uqlkj ;g vihy lkjghu gksus ds vk/kkj ij vLohdkj dh tkrh gSA 29- vf/koDrk chek dEiuh us fuosnu fd;k gS fd mUgksaus lEiw.kZ iapkV jkf'k v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds le{k tek djk j[kh gSA vr% tek'kqnk jkf'k dk forj.k ÁR;FkhZ DysesaV~l esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds iapkV@fu.kZ; ds vuqlkj vfoyEc dj fn;k tkosA