Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 2080 (MAD)

R. Boopathi v. Sub Collector, Tirupattur

2017-07-17

M.VENUGOPAL, P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

body2017
ORDER : M. VENUGOPAL, J. 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Government Advocate for the Respondents. 2. According to the Petitioner, he belong to Kurumans Community, which is a Scheduled Tribe. It is the specific case of the Petitioner that an application on 16.02.2017 to the 1st Respondent (Sub Collector, Tirupattur, Vellore District) seeking for issuance of a community certificate to him to the effect that he belongs to 'Kurumans Community (Scheduled Tribe)'. 3. At this juncture, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the 1st Respondent viz., the Sub Collector, Tirupattur, Vellore District should have commenced an enquiry in regard to the community status of the Petitioner on receipt of his application so as to complete the process of an enquiry within a reasonable time. 4. The main grievance of the Petitioner appears to be that the 1st Respondent till date has not yet commenced an enquiry into the community status of the Petitioner. In this connection, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks in aid of the Division Bench order passed by this Court in W.P.No.21817 of 2015 dated 22.07.2015 between K.Shanmugapriya V. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District and another [in which M.Venugopal, J. was a Member], whereby and whereunder, at paragraphs 6 & 7, it is, inter alia, observed as under: “6. In the case on hand, concededly, the first respondent has addressed a letter to the Tahsildar to conduct an enquiry as to the community status of the petitioner. But, till date, as pleaded by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has not received any communication in respect of submission of the report. 7. Such being the fact situation, the first respondent is directed to examine the entire issue at the earliest, keeping in mind, the decision of the Supreme Court in Kumari Madhurai Patil (supra) and the Cultural Report on Kurumans sent by the second respondent to the first respondent, vide his letter dated 18th February, 2015 and all other relevant documents and factors before passing the appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such an exercise shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 5. Such an exercise shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 5. Added further, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner succinctly informs this Court that the subject matter in issue in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the Division Bench Order of this Court in W.P.No.21817 of 2015 dated 22.07.2015. 6. However, the said factum of the subject matter in the Writ Petition, being covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.21817 of 2015 dated 22.07.2015, is not disputed by the Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondents. 7. In view of the above, considering the limited relief sought for by the Petitioner in the present Writ Petition, this Court, simpliciter, directs the 1st Respondent viz., the Sub Collector, Tirupattur, Vellore District to conduct the enquiry into the community status of the Petitioner, with special reference to the anthropological and ethnological traits of 'Kurumans' Scheduled Tribe, which are mentioned in the Cultural Report on 'Kurumans' dated 18.02.2015 sent by the 2nd Respondent viz., the Director of Tribal Welfare, Chennai, the 1st Respondent viz., the Sub Collector, Tirupattur, Vellore District, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and to pass a reasoned speaking order on merits, of course, in a Just, Fair, unbiased with an open mind and in a dispassionate manner and in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law. The 1st Respondent, while passing the necessary orders in the subject matter in issue, is to provide an adequate opportunity to the Petitioner, by adhering to the Principles of Natural Justice. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.