Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 2172 (RAJ)

Amarchand v. State of Rajasthan

2017-10-09

PANKAJ BHANDARI

body2017
JUDGMENT : Pankaj Bhandari, J. Petitioner has filed this miscellaneous bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., 1973 2. F.I.R. No. 88/2017 was registered at Police Station Jawar Mines (Raj.) for offence under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has joined the investigation. Matter is triable by First Class Magistrate. Petitioner is not required for further investigation. No useful purpose would be served in arresting the petitioner. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail application. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Jawar Mines (Raj. in F.I.R. No. 88/2017 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions :- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.