JUDGMENT : DINESH MEHTA, J. Mr. Parvez appearing for the respondents at the outset submits that the issue of reservation raised in the present writ petition has already been set at rest by the Coordinate Bench decision rendered in S.B Civil Writ Petition No. 2231/2017 (Bhoduram v. State of Rajasthan) decided on 12.05.2017, wherein this Court has observed as under:— “16. This Court is also satisfied that the reservation criteria would not apply in view of the fact that the selections are of a limited post which are less than four in number and the same is not for a particular year. Thus, it is noted that for a selection on regular posts reservation policy of the State Government is essential. It may also apply in some cases relating to adhoc appointments when the adhoc appointments are likely to continue for years together. In another SBCW No. 2413/2017; Dr. Ambedkar Schedule Anusoochit Jai Adhikari-Karamachari (AJAK) v. State of Rajasthan decided on 17.02.2017, this Court has already taken a view that reservation would not apply to the Gram Panchayat Sahayak selection, the order of this Court has also been upheld by the Division Bench. 17. In the circumstances, this Court finds that the respondent-State Government should be allowed to go further with the selection for the post of Gram Panchayat Sahayak at the respective Gram Panchayat level, for which interviews have already been held. Selections be now made and appointments be given as per the criteria which has been laid down by the State Government and approved hereinabove. 18. The writ petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.” 2. In view of the enunciation aforesaid the present writ petition is dismissed.