ORDER : VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B Civil Writ petition Number 10616/2015: Smt. Pushpa Trivedi v. State of Rajasthan, vide order dated 8th September, 2015. 2. Learned counsel also contended that the order aforesaid has been upheld the Division Bench of this Court in a batch of special appeals lead case being D.B Civil Special Appeal No. 829/2014, decided on 7.8.2015 3. It is further contended that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, within a time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter. In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Smt. Pushpa Trivedi (supra). 4. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law; however, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.