Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 2342 (RAJ)

M. Amjat Shariff S/o Mahaboob Shariff v. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor

2017-11-01

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

body2017
ORDER : PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that it is broadly a matter between the company and is of a civil nature. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the mandatory transaction has almost culminated into the end of the dispute. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner want to submit a representation along with all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioner submit a representation along with all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the investigation. 5. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petitions are disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the petitioner submit a representation along with all the necessary documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered and decided before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor. However, if during the investigation, the concerned investigating authority needs to arrest the petitioner, then the petitioner shall be given 15 days notice before making such arrest. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises. It is made clear that the petitioner shall be required to completely cooperate with the investigation.