Shyam Lal Meena Son of Shri. Latur Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan
2017-11-02
DINESH MEHTA
body2017
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : DINESH MEHTA, J. 1. Mr. Yashpal Khileree, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by a judgment dated 11.10.2017 rendered by this Court in S.B Civil Writ Petition No. 8890/2014 titled as “Gopal Charan v. The State of Rajsthan”. 2. Mr. Sunil Joshi, Associate of Mr. Rajesh Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, is not in a position to controvert the factual and legal position obtaining in the present writ petition. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands allowed in the following terms: “Following the Division Bench judgment dated 26.02.2016, it is declared that the petitioner having worked as Ayurved Nurse/Compounder on contractual basis with the respondent No. 3 (Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University), is entitled for bonus marks on the basis of experience certificate dated 25.06.2013 (Annex.-4). 4. The respondents are directed to do the needful within a period of eight weeks from today. 5. It is however, clarified that if the petitioner falls in the merit list/select list, he shall be given appointment. 6. The petitioner shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits notionally and his appointment shall be treated from the date, candidates having equal numbers were given appointment. 7. Petition allowed, however without any order as to costs.”