ORDER : 1. Counsel for the appellant submits that the orders which are impugned before the ld. Single Judge dt. 14.11.2014 followed with 29.04.2015 & 13.06.2017 passed by the respective revenue authorities. 2. Ld. Single Judge after hearing the parties find no error in the order impugned which call for interference of this Court and even further observed that no case is made out for grant of status quo as prayed for by the writ petitioner but still with a further rider restrain the parties not to alienate the property during pendency of the suit in view of Sec. 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. 3. Counsel submits that Sec. 52 of the Transfer of Property Act does not bar the parties and that apart in the pending suit the injunction application filed by the writ petitioner was dismissed & in the given facts & circumstances restraining the appellant from alienating the property in question certainly put a rider on the rights of the parties which ordinarily was not justified atleast after the observation being made upholding the orders passed by the revenue authorities in the pending suit and hearing of the suit may take its own time. 4. Issue notice to the respondent No. 1 as to why the appeal may not be disposed of finally at the motion stage. Issue notice of the stay application also. Rule be made returnable within two weeks. Notices be given ‘dasti’ if desired. 5. Counsel for the appellant may additionally serve a copy of appeal counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents before the ld. Single Judge.